Contemporary Philosophical Apologetics: Some Methodological Criticisms
For various philosophical and extra-philosophical reasons analytic philosophy of religion has moved in a direction that raises questions about the role of religious beliefs in academic philosophy. This article will first bring forward some general observations on contemporary analytic Christian phil...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Common Ground Publishing
2021
|
| In: |
The international journal of religion and spirituality in society
Year: 2021, Volume: 11, Issue: 2, Pages: 27-39 |
| Further subjects: | B
Method of Philosophy
B Wittgensteinian Philosophy of Religion B Religious Commitments |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1840952644 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230331124404.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230331s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.18848/2154-8633/CGP/v11i02/27-39 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1840952644 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1840952644 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Koistinen, Timo |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Koistinen, Timo | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Contemporary Philosophical Apologetics: Some Methodological Criticisms |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a For various philosophical and extra-philosophical reasons analytic philosophy of religion has moved in a direction that raises questions about the role of religious beliefs in academic philosophy. This article will first bring forward some general observations on contemporary analytic Christian philosophy of religion. After that it turns to explore recent critical comments on the current condition of this field of study. These controversies raise further questions concerning the general aim of philosophical investigation and its relation to religion, which are the main foci of this article. In the last section of the article these questions are examined from the point view of the Wittgensteinian approach to philosophy of religion as developed by Rush Rhees and D. Z. Phillips. | ||
| 601 | |a Philosophie | ||
| 601 | |a Apologetik | ||
| 601 | |a Methodologie | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Method of Philosophy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Religious Commitments | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Wittgensteinian Philosophy of Religion | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The international journal of religion and spirituality in society |d Champaign, Ill. : Common Ground Publishing, 2011 |g 11(2021), 2, Seite 27-39 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)683370324 |w (DE-600)2646017-8 |w (DE-576)485196581 |x 2154-8641 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2021 |g number:2 |g pages:27-39 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://cgscholar.com/bookstore/works/contemporary-philosophical-apologetics |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.18848/2154-8633/CGP/v11i02/27-39 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 11 |j 2021 |e 2 |h 27-39 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4300650594 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1840952644 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230331124404 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230331||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||