Is Eusebius of Caesarea a ‘Nicene’? A Contribution to the Notion of Conciliar Theology

Amidst recent explorations in conciliar theology by Timothy Pawl and others, pressing questions about our theological readings of the councils have arisen – are we to treat the theology of the councils as unique to their historical context? Or as a unified body of ‘conciliar’ theology? This paper ad...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Renberg, Adam R. (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Wiley-Blackwell 2023
Dans: International journal of systematic theology
Année: 2023, Volume: 25, Numéro: 2, Pages: 290-311
Classifications IxTheo:FA Théologie
KAB Christianisme primitif
KCC Conciles
NBF Christologie
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:Amidst recent explorations in conciliar theology by Timothy Pawl and others, pressing questions about our theological readings of the councils have arisen – are we to treat the theology of the councils as unique to their historical context? Or as a unified body of ‘conciliar’ theology? This paper addresses these questions, using Eusebius of Caesarea as a unique example of Nicene theology. It defines the metrics for evaluating different definitions of the term ‘Nicene’ by distinguishing between judgements and concepts. Then, it ‘measures’ Eusebius’ theology according to the two proposed definitions. Finally, it offers constructive comments for conciliar theology, claiming that conceptual language is clarified through the councils, even if its interpretation is not immediately fixed.
ISSN:1468-2400
Contient:Enthalten in: International journal of systematic theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/ijst.12583