Beyond Belief and Unbelief

The word "belief" and its derivatives, although still widely thought to characterize the essential religious attitude, have proved on closer examination to be surprisingly inapt. Belief, which centuries ago designated an attitude of affection for, trust in, and commitment to another person...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wulff, David M. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 1999
In: Research in the social scientific study of religion
Year: 1999, Volume: 10, Pages: 1-15
Further subjects:B History of religion
B Social sciences
B Religionswissenschaften
B Religion & Gesellschaft
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1839878835
003 DE-627
005 20230323104417.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230323s1999 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/9789004496224_004  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1839878835 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1839878835 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Wulff, David M.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Beyond Belief and Unbelief 
264 1 |c 1999 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The word "belief" and its derivatives, although still widely thought to characterize the essential religious attitude, have proved on closer examination to be surprisingly inapt. Belief, which centuries ago designated an attitude of affection for, trust in, and commitment to another person, has become today our way of referring to the theoretical judgments that others make regarding propositions that we consider improbable or false. Belief as it is now understood has two essential components: a vague and shifting object, and an attitude toward this object. Whereas the contemporary understanding of belief suggests that only two attitudes are possible—affirmation of the object’s existence or denial of it—a third possibility, closer to belief’s original meaning, is suggested by Winnicott: an intermediate position of complex cognitive and emotional attitudes that include imaginative participation in, solemn appreciation for, or deep engagement with the religious object. The simple belief-disbelief dichotomy is a tenacious one, however, especially because declaring a belief in certain doctrines is for many people a pledge of allegiance to some religious community. Clarifying the possible alternative attitudes that can be taken toward religious content would be one of the greatest services that psychologists of religion could render today. But given the highly individual character of religious faith that this broader perspective implies, and the radically idiographic research methods that would then be required, social scientists are not soon likely to follow the examples of Rizzuto and Jung as they explore the ways in which people relate to internal images. Ordinary religious persons are also unlikely to abandon the term belief, for they cannot easily outgrow the dualistic thinking that is fostered by the rhetoric of belief and embrace instead a relativistic standpoint, which research has found to be associated with positive social attitudes and mental health. In the face of such evidence of the potential value of revising our thinking, we would be well advised to stop using the words believe and belief in scholarly discourse and consider, then, what lies beyond them. 
650 4 |a Religion & Gesellschaft 
650 4 |a Religionsgeschichte 
650 4 |a Religionswissenschaften 
650 4 |a Sozialwissenschaften 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Research in the social scientific study of religion  |d Leiden : Brill, 2007  |g 10(1999), Seite 1-15  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)894586033  |w (DE-600)2901099-8  |w (DE-576)491303807  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:10  |g year:1999  |g pages:1-15 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004496224/B9789004496224_s004.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004496224_004  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 10  |j 1999  |h 1-15 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4295445347 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1839878835 
LOK |0 005 20230323104417 
LOK |0 008 230323||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a History of religion,History of religion studies,History of religion,Social sciences,Social theory 
STB 0 0 |a Histoire religieuse,Histoire des religions,Sciences sociales 
STC 0 0 |a Ciencias sociales,Historia de la religión,Historia de la religión 
STD 0 0 |a Scienze sociali,Storia delle religioni,Storia delle religioni 
STE 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教史,社会科学 
STF 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教史,社會科學 
STG 0 0 |a Ciências sociais,História da religião,História da religião 
STH 0 0 |a История религии,История религии (дисциплина),Общественные науки 
STI 0 0 |a Θρησκευτική Ιστορία,Θρησκευτική Ιστορία (μάθημα),Κοινωνικές επιστήμες 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Gesellschaftswissenschaften,Sozialwissenschaft