Revisiting Joseph Campbell’s The Power of Myth
This paper considers the relevance of The Power of Myth to the secular study of religion. First, I identify the scholars from whom Campbell borrows concepts. I organize these scholars into three groups - the qualitative religious scholars, the quantitative religious scholars, and those who draw from...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Published: |
2014
|
In: |
IMW journal of religious studies
Year: 2014, Volume: 5, Issue: 1, Pages: 73-88 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1839519274 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20250112041554.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230317s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
035 | |a (DE-627)1839519274 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1839519274 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |8 1\p |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1249930049 |0 (DE-627)1786554631 |4 aut |a Gorman, Daniel |c Jr. |d 1991- | |
109 | |a Gorman, Daniel Jr. 1991- |a Gorman, Daniel 1991- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Revisiting Joseph Campbell’s The Power of Myth |
264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This paper considers the relevance of The Power of Myth to the secular study of religion. First, I identify the scholars from whom Campbell borrows concepts. I organize these scholars into three groups - the qualitative religious scholars, the quantitative religious scholars, and those who draw from both approaches. Next, I identify Joseph Campbell’s key ideas (the monomyth, the hero’s journey, the existence of a higher power or energy, the lack of myth in the modern world, and the notion that religion possesses given qualities). I then analyze the contradictions inherent within Campbell’s argument, for Campbell fails to synthesize three scholarly traditions into one coherent theory of religion. Additionally, I discuss Campbell’s descriptive reductionism, his reactionary views regarding secularization, and the political conservatism found within the book. I conclude that Power is not an authoritative work of secular religious scholarship, but rather one man’s subjective blend of research and personal beliefs. | ||
601 | |a Campbell, Joseph | ||
601 | |a Campbell, W. E. | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t IMW journal of religious studies |d Logan, UT : UtahState University, Merrill-Cazier Library, 2015 |g 5(2014), 1, Seite 73-88 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)869892967 |w (DE-600)2870686-9 |w (DE-576)477879608 |x 2155-1723 |7 nnas |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:5 |g year:2014 |g number:1 |g pages:73-88 |
776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)1753554594 |k Electronic | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/imwjournal/vol5/iss1/5 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
883 | |8 1 |a cgwrk |d 20241001 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4292256470 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1839519274 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20230317152346 | ||
LOK | |0 008 230317||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |