The Legislation of Islamic Jurisprudence: A Dialogue between Opponents and Proponents

Ijtihād, either individual or collective, has been controversial from the very beginning with respect to what extent the legislation of verdicts by Muslim jurists is allowed. There are two main opinions about taqnīn, i.e., the legislation of Islamic jurisprudence. The majority of Saudi scholars say...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zubair, Hafiz Muhammad (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: De Gruyter, Versita 2013
In: The Journal of Rotterdam Islamic and Social Sciences
Year: 2013, Volume: 4, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-15
Further subjects:B Islamic Law
B Legislation
B Ijtihād
B Codification
B Sharīʿa
B Islamic Jurisprudence
B Tadwīn
B Taqnīn
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1839502797
003 DE-627
005 20230317125310.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230317s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1839502797 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1839502797 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Zubair, Hafiz Muhammad  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Legislation of Islamic Jurisprudence: A Dialogue between Opponents and Proponents 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Ijtihād, either individual or collective, has been controversial from the very beginning with respect to what extent the legislation of verdicts by Muslim jurists is allowed. There are two main opinions about taqnīn, i.e., the legislation of Islamic jurisprudence. The majority of Saudi scholars say that it is ḥarām i.e., legally forbidden in Islamic Sharīʿa, whereas the majority of Egyptian jurists are of the opinion that it is essential and needed in the modern period. Most Muslim countries follow the Egyptian view by enforcing written constitutions and laws. The conclusion from the comparative study of arguments is that it is somehow better that there be no taqnīn. The evidence and arguments presented bythose scholars who argue for doing away with taqnīn seem more convincing because their basis is sharīʿa rulings and they also provide logical, historical, and observable evidence as well, whereas the other side proves it case by quoting general principles from Maṣlaḥa, Sadd al-Dharāʾiʿ, and Istiḥsān, and most of their arguments are based on experience, logic, and demonstrable proofs and do not provide enough Sharīʿa support. Historically, however, we have seen and how skillfully and exquisitely Sharīʿa Courts have worked in the past 13 centuries without taqnīn. 
650 4 |a Codification 
650 4 |a Ijtihād 
650 4 |a Islamic Jurisprudence 
650 4 |a Islamic Law 
650 4 |a Legislation 
650 4 |a Sharīʿa 
650 4 |a Tadwīn 
650 4 |a Taqnīn 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The Journal of Rotterdam Islamic and Social Sciences  |d Warsaw [u.a.] : De Gruyter, Versita, 2010  |g 4(2013), 1, Seite 1-15  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)772489017  |w (DE-600)2742765-1  |w (DE-576)398045720  |x 2199-6172  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:4  |g year:2013  |g number:1  |g pages:1-15 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jriss.nl/index.php/JRISS/article/view/27  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4292099421 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1839502797 
LOK |0 005 20230317125310 
LOK |0 008 230317||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL