No-Mind and Nothingness: From Zen Buddhism to Heidegger
In China there was a distinction between Zen Buddhism of the Tang Dynasty and that of the Sung Dynasty. In the Zen Buddhism of the Tang Dynasty the doctrine of wu-hsin (No-mind) played a key role; while in that of the Sung Dynasty the notion of wu (Nothingness) itself became the focus. In the former...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Simon Fraser University, David See Chai Lam Centre for International Communication
2010
|
In: |
Canadian Journal of Buddhist Studies
Year: 2010, Volume: 6, Pages: 37-56 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1839417501 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230317091005.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230317s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
035 | |a (DE-627)1839417501 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1839417501 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Wing-Cheuk, Chan |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a No-Mind and Nothingness: From Zen Buddhism to Heidegger |
264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In China there was a distinction between Zen Buddhism of the Tang Dynasty and that of the Sung Dynasty. In the Zen Buddhism of the Tang Dynasty the doctrine of wu-hsin (No-mind) played a key role; while in that of the Sung Dynasty the notion of wu (Nothingness) itself became the focus. In the former, wu primarily represented a functional principle, whereas in the latter, it became an ontological principle. Historically, the doctrine of No-mind was introduced by Hui-neng, the founder of the Southern School of Zen Buddhism. Later in the Lin-chi School, this doctrine was concretized into the concept of wu-wei jan-jen. In modern scholarship, both the concepts of No-mind and of wu-wei jan-jen, however, remain unclear. As a result, the Japanese Critical Buddhism even claims that Zen is not Buddhist. This paper will show in what way Heideggerian phenomenology can contribute to the articulation of a particular type of religious experience, namely, the Zen experience. As wil be seen, with the help of Heidegger’s doctrine of Dasein as the "place-holder of Nothingness," it is possible to achieve a proper understanding of thesemajor concepts in Zen Buddhism. Moreover, in terms of the turn (Kehre) in Heidegger’s way of thinking, one can understand why there was a transition from "No-mind" to "Nothingness" in the development of Zen Buddhism. Finally, one can trace the origin of the Kyoto School’s notion of "locus" (basho) in the concept of wu-wei jan-jen. , | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Canadian Journal of Buddhist Studies |d Vancouver, British Columbia : Simon Fraser University, David See Chai Lam Centre for International Communication, 2005 |g 6(2010), Seite 37-56 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)665429991 |w (DE-600)2620396-0 |w (DE-576)348217285 |x 1710-825X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:6 |g year:2010 |g pages:37-56 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://thecjbs.org/archive-document-details/?id=128 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4291983115 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1839417501 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20230317091005 | ||
LOK | |0 008 230317||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |