A Platonic delusion: The identification of psychosis and mysticism

This paper discusses the frequently-made claim that psychosis and mysticism are identifiable. Noting the failure of attempts by others to define psychosis and mysticism, I present what I call the symptomatological case for identifying them, hoping in this way to give an idea of their essential featu...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kemp, Daren (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Taylor & Francis 2000
In: Mental health, religion & culture
Year: 2000, Volume: 3, Issue: 2, Pages: 157-172
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1838610405
003 DE-627
005 20230308142712.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230308s2000 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/713685600  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1838610405 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1838610405 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Kemp, Daren  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A Platonic delusion: The identification of psychosis and mysticism 
264 1 |c 2000 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper discusses the frequently-made claim that psychosis and mysticism are identifiable. Noting the failure of attempts by others to define psychosis and mysticism, I present what I call the symptomatological case for identifying them, hoping in this way to give an idea of their essential features. More general observations about the theoretical nature of the relationship between mental health and religion are made which might indicate an identification of psychosis and mysticism. It is then claimed that the idea of the identification often derives, though at times unconsciously, from an outmoded Platonic model. A short sketch of the intellectual history of the identification is presented. Finally, a more plausible basis for comparing psychosis and mysticism is offered, based on similar sociological origins or individual psychodynamic factors, before concluding that a fundamental difference in the conceptual status of psychosis as an illness and mysticism as a valued state of consciousness a priori precludes their identification. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Mental health, religion & culture  |d London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 1998  |g 3(2000), 2, Seite 157-172  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320602273  |w (DE-600)2020319-6  |w (DE-576)096290595  |x 1469-9737  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:3  |g year:2000  |g number:2  |g pages:157-172 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/713685600  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 3  |j 2000  |e 2  |h 157-172 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4284816322 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1838610405 
LOK |0 005 20230308142712 
LOK |0 008 230308||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL