‘Prejudices are Tyrants of the Soul’: Pedagogy and Préjugés in Revolutionary France

Through an analysis of textbooks, educational pamphlets, and the correspondence and minutes of the Committee of Public Instruction (22 September 1792-26 October 1795), I argue that authors discussing public instruction under the National Convention invoked the dangers of prejudice as a foil against...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Malcolm, Hannah N. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2018
In: Politics, religion & ideology
Year: 2018, Volume: 19, Issue: 2, Pages: 196-216
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1838564349
003 DE-627
005 20230308104234.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230308s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/21567689.2018.1455032  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1838564349 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1838564349 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Malcolm, Hannah N.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a ‘Prejudices are Tyrants of the Soul’: Pedagogy and Préjugés in Revolutionary France 
264 1 |c 2018 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Through an analysis of textbooks, educational pamphlets, and the correspondence and minutes of the Committee of Public Instruction (22 September 1792-26 October 1795), I argue that authors discussing public instruction under the National Convention invoked the dangers of prejudice as a foil against which to articulate their own vision for the Revolution. Rather than passively accepting a definition imposed from above, these authors took advantage of prejudices’ discursive flexibility in order to defend their own visions of the Revolution. As manifestations of counter-revolutionary tendencies and heteronomous reason, prejudices were consistently decried as threats to public safety and the project of regeneration, and public instruction was therefore tailored towards combatting them. While prejudices were thus deployed to ensure that complaints or proposals were taken seriously, prejudices also functioned as a derogatory term used to dismiss others’ ideas on a philosophical premise so as to avoid the necessity of engaging with them. Although the discussions about public instruction revealed ambitious hopes for preparing society for a glorious future, prejudices represented the fear that the past would be forever haunting them and thwarting their efforts. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Politics, religion & ideology  |d London [u.a.] : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2011  |g 19(2018), 2, Seite 196-216  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)655205705  |w (DE-600)2601917-6  |w (DE-576)343267411  |x 2156-7697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:19  |g year:2018  |g number:2  |g pages:196-216 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2018.1455032  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4284677748 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1838564349 
LOK |0 005 20230308104234 
LOK |0 008 230308||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL