Religionisation of Politics in Sri Lanka, Thailand and Myanmar

Until quite recently, religion was considered a negligible variable both in violent conflict and politics. At most, it was perceived as an ideological pretext hiding other, economic or political causes for conflict, in which religion was merely instrumentalised by the powerful. This view has changed...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Helbardt, Sascha (Author) ; Hellmann-Rajanayagam, Dagmar (Author) ; Korff, Rüdiger (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2013
In: Politics, religion & ideology
Year: 2013, Volume: 14, Issue: 1, Pages: 36-58
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 183855825X
003 DE-627
005 20230308100702.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230308s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/21567689.2012.752358  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)183855825X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP183855825X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Helbardt, Sascha  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Religionisation of Politics in Sri Lanka, Thailand and Myanmar 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Until quite recently, religion was considered a negligible variable both in violent conflict and politics. At most, it was perceived as an ideological pretext hiding other, economic or political causes for conflict, in which religion was merely instrumentalised by the powerful. This view has changed decisively over the last two decades. In many political and conflict situations ‘Religion’ is now implicitly or explicitly considered as a self-explanatory factor that cannot be questioned further. The article questions these assumptions: religion can never count as the only or the self-explanatory factor underlying any (violent) conflict situation. Yet, it cannot be perceived as merely an ideological means to be instrumentalised for their own purposes by ruling elites either. While this top-down perception does apply in many cases and is captured by the term ‘politicisation of religion’, bottom-up processes can and do intervene to bring about the reverse effect: the religionisation of politics. We illustrate this with empirical examples taken from Sri Lanka, Myanmar, and Thailand. Instead of religion being used to realise political objectives, politics becomes an instrument of implementing religious practice. These are not exclusionary processes, they influence each other and create their own dynamics, leading to the exclusion of the ‘Other’ and from there frequently to violence. 
601 |a Sri Lanka 
601 |a Thailand 
601 |a Myanmar 
700 1 |a Hellmann-Rajanayagam, Dagmar  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Korff, Rüdiger  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Politics, religion & ideology  |d London [u.a.] : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2011  |g 14(2013), 1, Seite 36-58  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)655205705  |w (DE-600)2601917-6  |w (DE-576)343267411  |x 2156-7697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:14  |g year:2013  |g number:1  |g pages:36-58 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2012.752358  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 14  |j 2013  |e 1  |h 36-58 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4284651552 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 183855825X 
LOK |0 005 20230308100702 
LOK |0 008 230308||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL