In Defence of Totalitarianism Theory as a Tool of Historical Scholarship

Following recent attacks on the value of totalitarianism theory as a tool of historical scholarship, this article sets out to clarify its meaning and counter the main objections to its use. After refuting claims that the theory is too freighted with Cold War baggage to serve any academic purpose, th...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Grieder, Peter (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Taylor & Francis 2007
In: Totalitarian movements and political religions
Year: 2007, Volume: 8, Issue: 3/4, Pages: 563-589
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1838551999
003 DE-627
005 20230314101830.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230308s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/14690760701571205  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1838551999 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1838551999 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Grieder, Peter  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a In Defence of Totalitarianism Theory as a Tool of Historical Scholarship 
264 1 |c 2007 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Following recent attacks on the value of totalitarianism theory as a tool of historical scholarship, this article sets out to clarify its meaning and counter the main objections to its use. After refuting claims that the theory is too freighted with Cold War baggage to serve any academic purpose, the concept of an inefficient totalitarian state is posited. A distinction is then drawn between the genocidal‐charismatic totalitarianism of the Third Reich and the bureaucratic totalitarianism of the German Democratic Republic (GDR) and other East European Communist countries. Stalinist Russia is presented as a complex hybrid of the two. Both National Socialism and Marxist-Leninism are viewed as political religions. The article argues for a more flexible and pragmatic application of totalitarianism theory so that it can help explain change and collapse, address the alleged welfare achievements of the Soviet satellites and pay proper attention to the symbiotic links between state and society. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Totalitarian movements and political religions  |d London : Taylor & Francis, 2000  |g 8(2007), 3/4, Seite 563-589  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)357169360  |w (DE-600)2094283-7  |w (DE-576)273873512  |x 1743-9647  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:8  |g year:2007  |g number:3/4  |g pages:563-589 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/14690760701571205  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 8  |j 2007  |e 3/4  |h 563-589 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4284632086 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1838551999 
LOK |0 005 20230308092102 
LOK |0 008 230308||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL