Protestant Presuppositions and the Study of the Early Buddhist Oral Tradition

Several decades ago, Lance Cousins published an article arguing that the Oral Theory from the field of Classics is useful for understanding the early production and dissemination of the Buddhist literature. Since then, several scholars, while at times adopting the language of Oral Theory, have been...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mcgovern, Nathan (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Peeters Publishers 2019
In: Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies
Year: 2019, Volume: 42, Pages: 449-491
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1837961034
003 DE-627
005 20230302140040.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230302s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2143/JIABS.42.0.3287485  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1837961034 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1837961034 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Mcgovern, Nathan  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Protestant Presuppositions and the Study of the Early Buddhist Oral Tradition 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Several decades ago, Lance Cousins published an article arguing that the Oral Theory from the field of Classics is useful for understanding the early production and dissemination of the Buddhist literature. Since then, several scholars, while at times adopting the language of Oral Theory, have been critical of Cousins’ argument that there was an improvisatory stage in the dissemination of the early Buddhist literature, arguing instead that it must have been passed down through strict memorization. In this article, which I dedicate to the memory of Lance Cousins, I argue that his original insight was correct, and that if we understand Oral Theory properly as implying a conservative tradition characterized by a certain amount of improvisation rather than strict memorization, then its applicability to the early Buddhist literature is born out by comparison of Pali suttas to their counterparts preserved in other languages. I further argue that resistance to this conclusion is rooted in certain Protestant assumptions about religion as located in a fixed scripture. 
601 |a Protestant 
601 |a Buddhist 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a International Association of Buddhist Studies  |t Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies  |d Leuven : Peeters Publishers, 1978  |g 42(2019), Seite 449-491  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)682239771  |w (DE-600)2643864-1  |w (DE-576)356322173  |x 2507-0347  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:42  |g year:2019  |g pages:449-491 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.2143/JIABS.42.0.3287485  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://poj.peeters-leuven.be/content.php?url=article&id=3287485&journal_code=JIABS  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4282584432 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1837961034 
LOK |0 005 20230302140040 
LOK |0 008 230302||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL