DIALOGUE AND ETHICS: Can the Study of Dialogue Teach Us Something about Ethics?

Habermas and Apel tried to give Ethics a philosophical justification by analyzing the way we realize discourses. A discourse is a special kind of a dialogue or, more generally, communication. Habermas’ and Apel’s contributions profoundly influenced German philosophy and jurisprudence. Yet, Ernst Tug...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kesselring, Thomas (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2017
In: Journal of Dharma
Year: 2017, Volume: 42, Issue: 3, Pages: 311-334
Further subjects:B Competition
B Discourse
B Ethics
B Moral Rules
B Dialogue
B Debate
B Human Rights
B Apel
B Habermas
B Co-Operation
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1837812489
003 DE-627
005 20260119093417.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230301s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1837812489 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1837812489 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Kesselring, Thomas  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a DIALOGUE AND ETHICS: Can the Study of Dialogue Teach Us Something about Ethics? 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Habermas and Apel tried to give Ethics a philosophical justification by analyzing the way we realize discourses. A discourse is a special kind of a dialogue or, more generally, communication. Habermas’ and Apel’s contributions profoundly influenced German philosophy and jurisprudence. Yet, Ernst Tugendhat, a friend of Habermas, very soon pronounced the objection, that the procedure of Habermas and Apel was circular: Their definition and description of "discourse" relied implicitly to the main ethical rules, and therefore these rules can easily be recognized by analyzing the settings (or structure) of a discourse. In the following text I’ll try to show that Tugendhat’s objection is valid, but nevertheless Habermas’ and Apel’s discourse philosophies remain inspiring for everyone interested in giving Ethics a solid foundation. I will argue, however, that the central pillar of this foundation is not discourse itself, but a particular kind of co-operation ("qualified cooperation"), of which discourse is an example. The main step in my argumentation consists in showing that different kinds of communication - discourse, negotiation, debate - correspond closely to different kinds of human interaction, of which "qualified co-operation" is the basic one. 
650 4 |a Apel 
650 4 |a Co-Operation 
650 4 |a Competition 
650 4 |a Debate 
650 4 |a Dialogue 
650 4 |a Discourse 
650 4 |a Ethics 
650 4 |a Habermas 
650 4 |a Human Rights 
650 4 |a Moral Rules 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of Dharma  |d Bengaluru : Dharmaram College, 1975  |g 42(2017), 3, Seite 311-334  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1765453895  |w (DE-600)3078855-9  |x 0253-7222  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:42  |g year:2017  |g number:3  |g pages:311-334 
856 4 0 |u http://dvkjournals.in/index.php/jd/article/view/253  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4281881093 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1837812489 
LOK |0 005 20230301105947 
LOK |0 008 230301||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
LOK |0 939   |a 01-03-23  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a The Ethics