Response to Prof S. K. Ramachandra Rao
Professor S. K. Ramachandra Rao's thesis ("Chos: The Unique Dharma of Tibet," Bangalore: JOURNAL OF DHARMA, Vol. I, Nos. 1 & 2, July, 1975, pp. 137-151) is that the Buddhism of Tibet, or chos in Tibetan, is not really Buddhism at all but a shamanism with Buddhist trappings. Our cr...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Review |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
1976
|
| In: |
Journal of Dharma
Jahr: 1976, Band: 1, Heft: 3, Seiten: 284-294 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
anatmavada
B Rezension B Buddhadharma B chos |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Zusammenfassung: | Professor S. K. Ramachandra Rao's thesis ("Chos: The Unique Dharma of Tibet," Bangalore: JOURNAL OF DHARMA, Vol. I, Nos. 1 & 2, July, 1975, pp. 137-151) is that the Buddhism of Tibet, or chos in Tibetan, is not really Buddhism at all but a shamanism with Buddhist trappings. Our critique of his article shall be twofold: In the first place, we should like to ask Professor Rao what is this thing he calls "Buddhism" which chos is not; in the second place, we shall point out some historical inconsistencies and misrepresentations and call into question some dubious etymologies and renderings from the Tibetan. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0253-7222 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Journal of Dharma
|
