What is wrong with religious education? A response to Philip Barnes

This article reviews Philip Barnes’ account of problems with religious eEducation (RE), and explores the practical implications of his position. Acknowledging his compelling logic - that RE is premised on an acceptance of all religions as equally theologically true - this article argues for optimism...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Whately, Hugo (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: 2008
Dans: Journal of beliefs and values
Année: 2008, Volume: 29, Numéro: 1, Pages: 29-37
Sujets non-standardisés:B Phenomenology
B Inclusive
B normative values
B attainment targets
B religious difference
B post‐liberal paradigm
B exclusive
B Syncretism
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:This article reviews Philip Barnes’ account of problems with religious eEducation (RE), and explores the practical implications of his position. Acknowledging his compelling logic - that RE is premised on an acceptance of all religions as equally theologically true - this article argues for optimism: with controversy and ambiguity moving to centre stage, a re‐orientation of RE’s attainment targets could focus RE curricula and provide a measure of direction for future progress. Equally, a focus on developing individual values for life in a plural democracy - where personal destinies often conflict both culturally and existentially - would likewise give RE a more potent purpose and the foundations for a normative agenda. Inspired by J.S. Mill, this article concludes that such RE may have to move beyond the classroom to achieve its potential as a critical, inclusive, relevant and progressive subject with coherent social and educational aims.
ISSN:1469-9362
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal of beliefs and values
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/13617670801928209