What is wrong with religious education? A response to Philip Barnes
This article reviews Philip Barnes’ account of problems with religious eEducation (RE), and explores the practical implications of his position. Acknowledging his compelling logic - that RE is premised on an acceptance of all religions as equally theologically true - this article argues for optimism...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge
2008
|
| In: |
Journal of beliefs and values
Year: 2008, Volume: 29, Issue: 1, Pages: 29-37 |
| Further subjects: | B
Phenomenology
B Inclusive B normative values B attainment targets B religious difference B post‐liberal paradigm B exclusive B Syncretism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 183772668X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230228135033.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230228s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/13617670801928209 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)183772668X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP183772668X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Whately, Hugo |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a What is wrong with religious education? A response to Philip Barnes |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2008 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article reviews Philip Barnes’ account of problems with religious eEducation (RE), and explores the practical implications of his position. Acknowledging his compelling logic - that RE is premised on an acceptance of all religions as equally theologically true - this article argues for optimism: with controversy and ambiguity moving to centre stage, a re‐orientation of RE’s attainment targets could focus RE curricula and provide a measure of direction for future progress. Equally, a focus on developing individual values for life in a plural democracy - where personal destinies often conflict both culturally and existentially - would likewise give RE a more potent purpose and the foundations for a normative agenda. Inspired by J.S. Mill, this article concludes that such RE may have to move beyond the classroom to achieve its potential as a critical, inclusive, relevant and progressive subject with coherent social and educational aims. | ||
| 601 | |a Barnes, Philip | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a attainment targets | |
| 650 | 4 | |a exclusive | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Inclusive | |
| 650 | 4 | |a normative values | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Phenomenology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a post‐liberal paradigm | |
| 650 | 4 | |a religious difference | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Syncretism | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of beliefs and values |d Abingdon : Routledge, 1980 |g 29(2008), 1, Seite 29-37 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320634914 |w (DE-600)2024386-8 |w (DE-576)094752656 |x 1469-9362 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:29 |g year:2008 |g number:1 |g pages:29-37 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/13617670801928209 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4277719910 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 183772668X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230228135033 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230228||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||