The Rhetoric of Violence, Religion, and Purity in India’s Cow Protection Movement

In India there has been a recent increase in violence and intolerance towards people who eat beef. While India has a fairly wide Cow Protection Act that bars the slaughter of female cows and calves, many areas have permitted slaughter of bulls and bullocks for centuries. Hindu religion has no doctri...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gittinger, Juli L. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Philosophy Documentation Center 2017
In: Journal of religion and violence
Year: 2017, Volume: 5, Issue: 2, Pages: 131-149
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1837139156
003 DE-627
005 20230221105254.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230220s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.5840/jrv201751540  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1837139156 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1837139156 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1192450892  |0 (DE-627)1670847357  |4 aut  |a Gittinger, Juli L. 
109 |a Gittinger, Juli L.  |a Gittinger, Juli 
245 1 4 |a The Rhetoric of Violence, Religion, and Purity in India’s Cow Protection Movement 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In India there has been a recent increase in violence and intolerance towards people who eat beef. While India has a fairly wide Cow Protection Act that bars the slaughter of female cows and calves, many areas have permitted slaughter of bulls and bullocks for centuries. Hindu religion has no doctrinal proscriptions against the consumption of beef in particular, although it has borrowed heavily from Jainism in the last century, arguing that the concept of ahimsa (nonviolence) forbids such slaughter and consumption of beef. Violence is exacted upon those who would dare eat beef—notably Muslims and lower castes—further politicizing the issue. This paper explores the various claims and legitimations of violence regarding the tradition of abstaining from beef. These include arguments of religious purity, racial biases, caste, and cultural arguments which have been put forth in defense of or in condemnation of beef-eaters. I argue that, in the case of such regulations of "authentic" Hindu traditions (like the sanctity of the cow), purity concerns are directly tied to Hindu nationalist ideologies. 
601 |a Religion 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religion and violence  |d Charlottesville, Virginia : Philosophy Documentation Center, 2013  |g 5(2017), 2, Seite 131-149  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)771398182  |w (DE-600)2740985-5  |w (DE-576)39669165X  |x 2159-6808  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:5  |g year:2017  |g number:2  |g pages:131-149 
856 |u https://hcommons.org/deposits/download/hc:27846/CONTENT/gittinger-rhetoric-of-violence-cow-protection-1.pdf/  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.5840/jrv201751540  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=jrv&id=jrv_2017_0005_0002_0131_0149  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 5  |j 2017  |e 2  |h 131-149 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4275058070 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1837139156 
LOK |0 005 20230220164757 
LOK |0 008 230220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL