Dueling over Dualism
Stewart Goetz and Charles Taliaferro in Naturalism (2008), and Chet Raymo in When God is Gone Everything is Holy (2008), take opposite views on the virtues of dualism, particularly regarding the immaterial soul and the material body. Goetz and Taliaferro hit hard at the implausibility of strict nat...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Equinox Publ.
2010
|
| In: |
Journal for the study of religion, nature and culture
Year: 2010, Volume: 4, Issue: 1, Pages: 72-87 |
| Further subjects: | B
Review Essay
B Naturalism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1836329555 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230216140121.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230216s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1558/jsrnc.v4i1.72 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1836329555 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1836329555 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)129936618 |0 (DE-627)484461753 |0 (DE-576)160933714 |4 aut |a Ferré, Frederick |d 1933- | |
| 109 | |a Ferré, Frederick 1933- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Dueling over Dualism |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Stewart Goetz and Charles Taliaferro in Naturalism (2008), and Chet Raymo in When God is Gone Everything is Holy (2008), take opposite views on the virtues of dualism, particularly regarding the immaterial soul and the material body. Goetz and Taliaferro hit hard at the implausibility of strict naturalism’s reduction of mind to brain, sharply criticizing broad naturalism’s difficulties with free, normative, value-led, personal action. If the choice is between the immaterial soul and naturalist denials and reductions, they defend dualism. Chet Raymo, as a scientist, loves nature and empirical method too much to accept the need for any other realm or way of knowing. If the choice is between modest intellectual integrity and dogmatic obscurantism, he rejects dualism. I reply that these are false choices: Whitehead’s mental and physical ‘duality’ in his bipolar cosmology trumps the need for ‘dualism’ without requiring denial of effective mentality and free personal action. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Naturalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Review Essay | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal for the study of religion, nature and culture |d London : Equinox Publ., 2007 |g 4(2010), 1, Seite 72-87 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)549634886 |w (DE-600)2395657-4 |w (DE-576)274589745 |x 1749-4915 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:4 |g year:2010 |g number:1 |g pages:72-87 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1558/jsrnc.v4i1.72 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://journal.equinoxpub.com/JSRNC/article/view/4773 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 4 |j 2010 |e 1 |h 72-87 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4272870084 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1836329555 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230216120414 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230216||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||