A Historical-Comparative Study of the Authorization of parrēsía in Philo’s Quis rerum divinarum heres sit and Quod omnis probus liber sit
A Historical-Comparative Study of the Authorization of παρρησία in Philo’s Quis rerum divinarum heres sit and Quod omnis probus liber sit
The article studies and compares how Philo authorizes παρρησία in Quis rerum divinarum heres sit and Quod omnis probus liber sit. After critically evaluating the scholarly literature on παρρησία in Philo, I go beyond the limitations of this literature by situating Philo’s views on παρρησία within th...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2023
|
| In: |
Journal for the study of Judaism
Year: 2023, Volume: 54, Issue: 1, Pages: 63-86 |
| Further subjects: | B
Authority
B Truth-telling B parrhēsia B Philo B Power |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |