A Kantian Response to the Problem of Evil: Living in the Moral World

James Sterba has presented a powerful and existentially sincere form of the problem of evil, arguing that it is logically impossible for God to exist, given that there are powerful moral requirements to prevent evil, where one can, and that these requirements would bind an all-powerful and good God,...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Insole, Christopher James (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: MDPI 2023
In: Religions
Year: 2023, Volume: 14, Issue: 2
Further subjects:B Evil
B Sterba
B God
B Kant
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1833774930
003 DE-627
005 20230209052507.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230209s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3390/rel14020227  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1833774930 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1833774930 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Insole, Christopher James  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A Kantian Response to the Problem of Evil: Living in the Moral World 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a James Sterba has presented a powerful and existentially sincere form of the problem of evil, arguing that it is logically impossible for God to exist, given that there are powerful moral requirements to prevent evil, where one can, and that these requirements would bind an all-powerful and good God, who would indeed be able to prevent such evil. The ‘Kantian’ argument that I set out, if accepted, would undermine the following stage of Sterba’s argument: Significant and especially horrendous evil consequences of immoral actions do obtain all around us, which, if God exists, would have to be through his permission. The Kantian argument will hold that we are able to believe that, in some sense, such horrendous evil consequences do not really obtain, although they appear to. The claim is not that the Kantian argument is ‘persuasive’, but that if some Kantian assumptions are granted, we do have a response to Sterba, which throws open a different way of looking at things. I conclude with some more informal reflections on what we might take away from the Kantian argument, even if we do not accept the deep assumptions, or the progression of the argument. I will not worry too much about demonstrating that this is a ‘correct reading’ of Kant, although I think it is. 
601 |a Problem 
650 4 |a God 
650 4 |a Sterba 
650 4 |a Evil 
650 4 |a Kant 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religions  |d Basel : MDPI, 2010  |g 14(2023), 2, Artikel-ID 227  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)665435797  |w (DE-600)2620962-7  |w (DE-576)348219067  |x 2077-1444  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:14  |g year:2023  |g number:2  |g elocationid:227 
856 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/2/227/pdf?version=1675992132  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14020227  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/2/227  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 14  |j 2023  |e 2  |i 227 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4269214740 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1833774930 
LOK |0 005 20230209052507 
LOK |0 008 230209||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-02-08#A8AA5A7C2BFFAEC59B68568487B0A82626CF7633 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL