On the Notion of the Circumstances of a Moral Act According to St. Thomas Aquinas

Because of the particularity of every human act, Aristotle held that circumstances play a pivotal role in the moral judgment of those same human acts. Considered in conjunction with the object and intention however, circumstances are seen as secondary considerations by those familiar with the though...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rolling, Matthew M. (Author)
Format: Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: 2018
In: Angelicum
Year: 2018, Volume: 95, Issue: 4, Pages: 421-447

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1833761731
003 DE-627
005 20231120095725.0
007 tu
008 230208s2018 it ||||| 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1833761731 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1833761731 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
044 |c XA-IT 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Rolling, Matthew M.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a On the Notion of the Circumstances of a Moral Act According to St. Thomas Aquinas  |c Matthew M. Rolling 
264 1 |c 2018 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Because of the particularity of every human act, Aristotle held that circumstances play a pivotal role in the moral judgment of those same human acts. Considered in conjunction with the object and intention however, circumstances are seen as secondary considerations by those familiar with the thought of St. Thomas Aquinas. It is the varied development of the notion of circumstances from Aristotle and Cicero to Aquinas which we seek to investigate here. This article first presents those two common traditions by which medieval writers commonly thought about circumstances. Next an analysis of ST I-II qq. 7 and 18 shows how Aquinas would incorporate these two traditions as well as the recent teachings of the Church given at the Fourth Lateran Council to develop his own unique response to the question. Despite the limits imposed by human language, St. Thomas’s insights and distinctions in the role of circumstances would bring to the discussion a clarity typical of the Angelic Doctor. In fine, his presentation of circumstances advanced a sharper and richer understanding of both the ontological and moral nature of a human act. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Angelicum  |d Roma, 1924  |g 95(2018), 4, Seite 421-447  |w (DE-627)166754048  |w (DE-600)301548-8  |w (DE-576)015190099  |x 1123-5772  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:95  |g year:2018  |g number:4  |g pages:421-447 
951 |a AR 
ELC |b 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4269003588 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1833761731 
LOK |0 005 20230208163321 
LOK |0 008 230208||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135-2  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135-2 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135-2 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a knix 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw