Transhumanism, Motion, and Human Perfection

Transhumanism’s ideology is marked by a commitment to the "progress" or "perfection" of the human species through technological means. What transhumanists are after is not just therapeutic intervention or optimization of current human capabilities, but an ontological change from...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mason, Jordan (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press 2022
In: Christian bioethics
Year: 2022, Volume: 28, Issue: 3, Pages: 185-196
IxTheo Classification:CF Christianity and Science
NBE Anthropology
NCJ Ethics of science
VA Philosophy
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1831425149
003 DE-627
005 20230417102605.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230118s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1093/cb/cbac011  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1831425149 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1831425149 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Mason, Jordan  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Transhumanism, Motion, and Human Perfection 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Transhumanism’s ideology is marked by a commitment to the "progress" or "perfection" of the human species through technological means. What transhumanists are after is not just therapeutic intervention or optimization of current human capabilities, but an ontological change from human to posthuman. In this article, I critique transhumanist ideology on the grounds that it fundamentally misunderstands human moral perfection as resulting from forces acting upon us (i.e., technological interventions), rather than an internal change of character. This misunderstanding reflects an impoverished view of the concept of motion brought about by the rise of modern science, which entails certain ontological commitments that are not Christian in nature. I conclude transhumanism is untenable because it rests on a shaky foundation of Newtonian physics, and reduces the world to mere matter and forces. Furthermore, Christian transhumanism is especially flawed, because it is complicit in this severing of creation from its sacramental ontology, from the Being of God. 
652 |a CF:NBE:NCJ:VA 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Christian bioethics  |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1995  |g 28(2022), 3, Seite 185-196  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320433358  |w (DE-600)2004029-5  |w (DE-576)094085587  |x 1744-4195  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:28  |g year:2022  |g number:3  |g pages:185-196 
856 4 0 |u https://academic.oup.com/cb/article/28/3/185/6658111  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1093/cb/cbac011  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 28  |j 2022  |e 3  |h 185-196 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4249547574 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1831425149 
LOK |0 005 20230417102605 
LOK |0 008 230118||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205168X  |a NBE 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736582  |a NCJ 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144204389X  |a CF 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL