Learning to Love Wisdom from Masters: The Value of Jonathan Edwards’ Philosophical Theology

Jonathan Edwards is generally acknowledged as one of the most prominent American philosophers. For instance, William K. Frankena, suggests that he was "certainly the ablest American philosopher to write before the great period of Peirce, James Royce, Dewey, and Santayana," and William Wain...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rehnman, Sebastian 1969- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: the Jonathan Edwards Center at Yale Universiry 2022
In: Jonathan Edwards studies
Year: 2022, Volume: 12, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 28-35
Further subjects:B Early Modern History
B hilosophy
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei registrierungspflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1831281945
003 DE-627
005 20240521165551.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230117s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1831281945 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1831281945 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1048732053  |0 (DE-627)781206227  |0 (DE-576)19009219X  |4 aut  |a Rehnman, Sebastian  |d 1969- 
109 |a Rehnman, Sebastian 1969- 
245 1 0 |a Learning to Love Wisdom from Masters  |b The Value of Jonathan Edwards’ Philosophical Theology 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Jonathan Edwards is generally acknowledged as one of the most prominent American philosophers. For instance, William K. Frankena, suggests that he was "certainly the ablest American philosopher to write before the great period of Peirce, James Royce, Dewey, and Santayana," and William Wainwright that he is "America’s most important and original philosophical theologian."In my recent work, however, I have argued that there are strong reasons for reconsideration of Edwards’ status since his major arguments for the existence and attributes of divinity are invalid or unsound. This raises the issue of the "value" of Jonathan Edwards’ thought for contemporary philosophical theology. Should contemporary philosophical theology assign a high or a low value to Edwards’ thought? 
601 |a Edwards, Jonathan 
601 |a Philosophie 
601 |a Theologe 
650 4 |a Early Modern History 
650 4 |a hilosophy 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Jonathan Edwards studies  |d New Haven : the Jonathan Edwards Center at Yale Universiry, 2011  |g 12(2022), 1/2, Seite 28-35  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)845689746  |w (DE-600)2844144-8  |w (DE-576)454038860  |x 2159-6875  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:12  |g year:2022  |g number:1/2  |g pages:28-35 
856 4 0 |u https://jestudies.yale.edu/index.php/journal/article/view/581  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei registrierungspflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4249093638 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1831281945 
LOK |0 005 20230117160536 
LOK |0 008 230117||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw