Aesthetic Truth Through the Ages: A Lonerganian Theory of Art History
Classical authors were generally artistic realists. The predominant aesthetic theory was mimesis, which saw the truth of art as its successful representation of reality. High modernists rejected this aesthetic theory as lifeless, seeing the truth of art as its subjective expression. This impasse has...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
2020
|
| In: |
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association
Year: 2020, Volume: 94, Pages: 139-151 |
| IxTheo Classification: | CD Christianity and Culture KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1830256157 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230502154948.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230103s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.5840/acpaproc2022829135 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1830256157 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1830256157 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Miller, Ryan Michael |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Aesthetic Truth Through the Ages |b A Lonerganian Theory of Art History |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Classical authors were generally artistic realists. The predominant aesthetic theory was mimesis, which saw the truth of art as its successful representation of reality. High modernists rejected this aesthetic theory as lifeless, seeing the truth of art as its subjective expression. This impasse has serious consequences for both the Church and the public square. Moving forward requires both, first, an appreciation of the strengths and weaknesses of the high modernist critique of classical mimetic theory, and, second, a theory of truth which makes adequate reference to both subject and object. This paper argues that Lonergan offers just such an account of truth, and so cashes out the high modernist rejection of classical mimesis in Lonergan's terms, thereby creating the opportunity for a synthesis of the two views. | ||
| 601 | |a Historie | ||
| 652 | |a CD:KAJ | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a American Catholic Philosophical Association |t Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association |d Washington, DC, 1926 |g 94(2020), Seite 139-151 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)376274395 |w (DE-600)2130243-1 |w (DE-576)443083517 |x 2153-7925 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:94 |g year:2020 |g pages:139-151 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.5840/acpaproc2022829135 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=acpaproc&id=acpaproc_2020_0094_0139_0151 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 94 |j 2020 |h 139-151 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 424312227X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1830256157 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230502154948 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230103||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043857 |a CD | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044640 |a KAJ | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||