Prenatal Testing for Selection against Disabilities

Disability rights advocates sometimes claim that prenatal tests to select against disabilities discriminate against people with disabilities. The “expressivist argument” that supports this position has been challenged on grounds of the difference between fetuses and born persons. In this essay, I ex...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mahowald, Mary B. (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publicado: 2007
En: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Año: 2007, Volumen: 16, Número: 4, Páginas: 457-462
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1827986689
003 DE-627
005 20221220052702.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0963180107070594  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827986689 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827986689 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Mahowald, Mary B.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Prenatal Testing for Selection against Disabilities 
264 1 |c 2007 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Disability rights advocates sometimes claim that prenatal tests to select against disabilities discriminate against people with disabilities. The “expressivist argument” that supports this position has been challenged on grounds of the difference between fetuses and born persons. In this essay, I explain why the expressivist argument is valid despite the questionableness of its conclusion, and why the distinction between fetuses and born persons fails to provide an adequate counterargument to the expressivist conclusion. I also consider a compelling argument for prenatal testing to select against disabilities and propose a reformulation of this argument that, I think, supports prenatal testing for disabilities while avoiding discrimination against people born with disabilities. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992  |g 16(2007), 4, Seite 457-462  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)306655039  |w (DE-600)1499985-7  |w (DE-576)081985010  |x 1469-2147  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:16  |g year:2007  |g number:4  |g pages:457-462 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180107070594  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/prenatal-testing-for-selection-against-disabilities/E7A325A3B57A63696972FD7078FD9582  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235391593 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827986689 
LOK |0 005 20221220052702 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#A2F8BFCE33173DD69DF4FBA1A931D2A87A70D5E5 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw