Whistleblowing and the Bioethicist’s Public Obligations

Bioethicists are sometimes thought to have heightened obligations by virtue of the fact that their professional role addresses ethics or morals. For this reason it has been argued that bioethicists ought to “whistleblow”—that is, publicly expose the wrongful or potentially harmful activities of thei...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Macdougall, D. Robert (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2014
In: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2014, Volume: 23, Issue: 4, Pages: 431-442
Further subjects:B Public Interest
B professional duties
B role of bioethicist
B Political ethics
B Organizational Ethics
B Whistleblowing
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1827986433
003 DE-627
005 20221220052701.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0963180114000103  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827986433 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827986433 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Macdougall, D. Robert  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Whistleblowing and the Bioethicist’s Public Obligations 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Bioethicists are sometimes thought to have heightened obligations by virtue of the fact that their professional role addresses ethics or morals. For this reason it has been argued that bioethicists ought to “whistleblow”—that is, publicly expose the wrongful or potentially harmful activities of their employer—more often than do other kinds of employees. This article argues that bioethicists do indeed have a heightened obligation to whistleblow, but not because bioethicists have heightened moral obligations in general. Rather, the special duties of bioethicists to act as whistleblowers are best understood by examining the nature of the ethical dilemma typically encountered by private employees and showing why bioethicists do not encounter this dilemma in the same way. Whistleblowing is usually understood as a moral dilemma involving conflicting duties to two parties: the public and a private employer. However, this article argues that this way of understanding whistleblowing has the implication that professions whose members identify their employer as the public—such as government employees or public servants—cannot consider whistleblowing a moral dilemma, because obligations are ultimately owed to only one party: the public. The article contends that bioethicists—even when privately employed—are similar to government employees in the sense that they do not have obligations to defer to the judgments of those with private interests. Consequently, bioethicists may be considered to have a special duty to whistleblow, although for different reasons than those usually cited. 
650 4 |a Political ethics 
650 4 |a Organizational Ethics 
650 4 |a Public Interest 
650 4 |a professional duties 
650 4 |a role of bioethicist 
650 4 |a Whistleblowing 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992  |g 23(2014), 4, Seite 431-442  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)306655039  |w (DE-600)1499985-7  |w (DE-576)081985010  |x 1469-2147  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:23  |g year:2014  |g number:4  |g pages:431-442 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180114000103  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/whistleblowing-and-the-bioethicists-public-obligations/911120D08C665A1D739AA155F6DC19A1  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 23  |j 2014  |e 4  |h 431-442 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235391348 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827986433 
LOK |0 005 20221220052701 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#1BEC488A28E44220E6DDC5852A3A511C9E8F9B67 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Whistleblowing 
STB 0 0 |a Lanceurs d'alerte 
STC 0 0 |a Alerta,Whistleblowing,Whistleblowing 
STD 0 0 |a Whistleblowing 
STF 0 0 |a 吹哨人 
STG 0 0 |a Denúncia,Whistleblowing,Whistleblowing 
STH 0 0 |a Доносительство 
STI 0 0 |a Whistleblowing 
SYE 0 0 |a Missstand,Whistle blowing