Why We Should Defend Gene Editing as Eugenics

This paper considers the relevance of the concept of “eugenics,”—a term associated with some of the most egregious crimes of the twentieth century—to the possibility of editing human genomes. The author identifies some uses of gene editing as eugenics but proposes that this identification does not s...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Agar, Nicholas (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2019
In: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2019, Volume: 28, Issue: 1, Pages: 9-19
Further subjects:B moral marketing
B Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis
B morally problematic practice
B Eugenics
B gene editing
B morally wrong practice
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1827986395
003 DE-627
005 20221220052701.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0963180118000336  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827986395 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827986395 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Agar, Nicholas  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Why We Should Defend Gene Editing as Eugenics 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper considers the relevance of the concept of “eugenics,”—a term associated with some of the most egregious crimes of the twentieth century—to the possibility of editing human genomes. The author identifies some uses of gene editing as eugenics but proposes that this identification does not suffice to condemn them. He proposes that we should distinguish between “morally wrong” practices, which should be condemned, and “morally problematic” practices that call for solutions, and he suggests that eugenic uses of gene editing fall into this latter category. Although when we choose the characteristics of future people we are engaging in morally dangerous acts, some interventions in human heredity should nevertheless be acknowledged as morally good. These morally good eugenic interventions include some uses of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. The author argues that we should think about eugenic interventions in the same way that we think about morally problematic interventions in public health. When we recognize some uses of gene editing as eugenics, we make the dangers of selecting or modifying human genetic material explicit. 
650 4 |a moral marketing 
650 4 |a morally wrong practice 
650 4 |a morally problematic practice 
650 4 |a Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis 
650 4 |a gene editing 
650 4 |a Eugenics 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992  |g 28(2019), 1, Seite 9-19  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)306655039  |w (DE-600)1499985-7  |w (DE-576)081985010  |x 1469-2147  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:28  |g year:2019  |g number:1  |g pages:9-19 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180118000336  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/why-we-should-defend-gene-editing-as-eugenics/00B15AEB625379F8543C43E286160B87  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235391305 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827986395 
LOK |0 005 20221220052701 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#3013142B55D22AAE1807790877C02A06900607FD 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw