Toward Critical Bioethics
This article deals with the question as to what makes bioethics a critical discipline. It considers different senses of criticism and evaluates their strengths and weaknesses. A primary method in bioethics as a philosophical discipline is critical thinking, which implies critical evaluation of conce...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2015
|
| In: |
Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2015, Volume: 24, Issue: 2, Pages: 154-164 |
| Further subjects: | B
Biotechnology
B Dialogue B Critique B Rationality B Bioethics B Hermeneutics B Power B Normativity |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1827985240 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221220052659.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221220s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0963180114000462 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1827985240 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1827985240 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Árnason, Vilhjálmur |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Toward Critical Bioethics |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article deals with the question as to what makes bioethics a critical discipline. It considers different senses of criticism and evaluates their strengths and weaknesses. A primary method in bioethics as a philosophical discipline is critical thinking, which implies critical evaluation of concepts, positions, and arguments. It is argued that the type of analytical criticism that restricts its critical role to critical thinking of this type often suffers from other intellectual flaws. Three examples are taken to demonstrate this: premature criticism, uncritical self-understanding of theoretical assumptions, and narrow framing of bioethical issues. Such flaws can lead both to unfair treatment of authors and to uncritical discussion of topics. In this context, the article makes use of Häyry’s analysis of different rationalities in bioethical approaches and argues for the need to recognize the importance of communicative rationality for critical bioethics. A radically different critical approach in bioethics, rooted in social theory, focuses on analyses of power relations neglected in mainstream critical thinking. It is argued that, although this kind of criticism provides an important alternative in bioethics, it suffers from other shortcomings that are rooted in a lack of normative dimensions. In order to complement these approaches and counter their shortcomings, there is a need for a bioethics enlightened by critical hermeneutics. Such hermeneutic bioethics is aware of its own assumptions, places the issues in a wide context, and reflects critically on the power relations that stand in the way of understanding them. Moreover, such an approach is dialogical, which provides both a critical exercise of speech and a normative dimension implied in the free exchange of reasons and arguments. This discussion is framed by Hedgecoe’s argument that critical bioethics needs four elements: to be empirically rooted, theory challenging, reflexive, and politely skeptical. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Rationality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Power | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Normativity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hermeneutics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dialogue | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Critique | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Biotechnology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bioethics | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992 |g 24(2015), 2, Seite 154-164 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)306655039 |w (DE-600)1499985-7 |w (DE-576)081985010 |x 1469-2147 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2015 |g number:2 |g pages:154-164 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180114000462 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/toward-critical-bioethics/E8B8337C333430DCA0014C172CFF5BB5 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 24 |j 2015 |e 2 |h 154-164 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4235390155 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1827985240 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221220052659 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#959080BF58E35A4C246D3BEC24E6EF3BEC38D145 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||