In Defense of Routine Recovery of Cadaveric Organs: A Response to Walter Glannon

Walter Glannon argues that our proposal for routine recovery (also known as conscription) of transplantable cadaveric organs is unacceptable “even if the consequence of [continuing to require consent] would be fewer organs for transplantation and fewer lives saved.” After carefully reviewing his cou...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Spital, Aaron (Author) ; Taylor, James S. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2008
In: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2008, Volume: 17, Issue: 3, Pages: 337-343
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 182798466X
003 DE-627
005 20221220052659.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0963180108080419  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)182798466X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP182798466X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Spital, Aaron  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a In Defense of Routine Recovery of Cadaveric Organs: A Response to Walter Glannon 
264 1 |c 2008 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Walter Glannon argues that our proposal for routine recovery (also known as conscription) of transplantable cadaveric organs is unacceptable “even if the consequence of [continuing to require consent] would be fewer organs for transplantation and fewer lives saved.” After carefully reviewing his counterarguments, we conclude that, although some of them have merit, none are sufficiently strong to warrant abandoning this plan. Below we respond to each of Glannon's concerns. 
700 1 |a Taylor, James S.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992  |g 17(2008), 3, Seite 337-343  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)306655039  |w (DE-600)1499985-7  |w (DE-576)081985010  |x 1469-2147  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:17  |g year:2008  |g number:3  |g pages:337-343 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180108080419  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/in-defense-of-routine-recovery-of-cadaveric-organs-a-response-to-walter-glannon/A8F5F6B908DBC6C7701BAA6A7EBC23EA  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 17  |j 2008  |e 3  |h 337-343 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235389572 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 182798466X 
LOK |0 005 20221220052659 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#09495156F06276E7FFEA3EE40C0455FC8AAD1279 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw