Let Us Assume That Gene Editing is Safe—The Role of Safety Arguments in the Gene Editing Debate
This paper provides an analysis of the statement, made in many papers and reports on the use of gene editing in humans, that we should only use the technology when it is safe. It provides an analysis of what the statement means in the context of nonreproductive and reproductive gene editing and argu...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2019
|
| In: |
Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2019, Volume: 28, Issue: 1, Pages: 100-111 |
| Further subjects: | B
Principle of Procreative Beneficence
B nonidentity problem B Gene modification B Gene Therapy B Harm B Safety B gene editing B reproductive liberty B wrong |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1827983868 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221220235210.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221220s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0963180118000439 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1827983868 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1827983868 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)101688954 |0 (DE-627)630198322 |0 (DE-576)325227624 |4 aut |a Holm, Søren |d 1901-1971 | |
| 109 | |a Holm, Søren 1901-1971 |a Holm, Sören 1901-1971 | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Let Us Assume That Gene Editing is Safe—The Role of Safety Arguments in the Gene Editing Debate |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper provides an analysis of the statement, made in many papers and reports on the use of gene editing in humans, that we should only use the technology when it is safe. It provides an analysis of what the statement means in the context of nonreproductive and reproductive gene editing and argues that the statement is inconsistent with the philosophical commitments of some of the authors, who put it forward in relation to reproductive uses of gene editing, specifically their commitment to Parfitian nonidentity considerations and to a legal principle of reproductive liberty.But, if that is true it raises a question about why the statement is made. What is its discursive and rhetorical function? Five functions are suggested, some of which are more contentious and problematic than others. It is argued that it is possible, perhaps even likely, that the “only when it is safe” rider is part of a deliberate obfuscation aimed at hiding the full implications of the arguments made about the ethics of gene editing and their underlying philosophical justifications. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a wrong | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Safety | |
| 650 | 4 | |a reproductive liberty | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Principle of Procreative Beneficence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a nonidentity problem | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Harm | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Gene Therapy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Gene modification | |
| 650 | 4 | |a gene editing | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992 |g 28(2019), 1, Seite 100-111 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)306655039 |w (DE-600)1499985-7 |w (DE-576)081985010 |x 1469-2147 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:28 |g year:2019 |g number:1 |g pages:100-111 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180118000439 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/let-us-assume-that-gene-editing-is-safethe-role-of-safety-arguments-in-the-gene-editing-debate/E760EB3B2463C32DF5F08DEE2F39AF0E |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 28 |j 2019 |e 1 |h 100-111 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4235388770 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1827983868 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221220052657 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#8B441DF88C8353AA6C813492F82473F894A0A77C | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||