The Prohibition of Sex Selection for Social Reasons in the United Kingdom: Public Opinion Trumps Reproductive Liberty?

From 2002 to 2003, the United Kingdom's Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) carried out a review of the available methods of sex selection, the central aims of which were, in the words of the subsequent report:I gratefully acknowledge the assistance offered by Dr. Peter Mills of...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Herissone-Kelly, Peter (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2006
In: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2006, Volume: 15, Issue: 3, Pages: 261-272
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1827983817
003 DE-627
005 20221220052657.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0963180106060336  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827983817 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827983817 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Herissone-Kelly, Peter  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Prohibition of Sex Selection for Social Reasons in the United Kingdom: Public Opinion Trumps Reproductive Liberty? 
264 1 |c 2006 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a From 2002 to 2003, the United Kingdom's Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) carried out a review of the available methods of sex selection, the central aims of which were, in the words of the subsequent report:I gratefully acknowledge the assistance offered by Dr. Peter Mills of the HFEA in helping me to understand the sometimes complex regulatory framework surrounding the practice of sex selection in the United Kingdom. 
601 |a Prohibition 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992  |g 15(2006), 3, Seite 261-272  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)306655039  |w (DE-600)1499985-7  |w (DE-576)081985010  |x 1469-2147  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:15  |g year:2006  |g number:3  |g pages:261-272 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180106060336  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/prohibition-of-sex-selection-for-social-reasons-in-the-united-kingdom-public-opinion-trumps-reproductive-liberty/E3FCA694E1E221F741E3B369AB0DAA91  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 15  |j 2006  |e 3  |h 261-272 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 423538872X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827983817 
LOK |0 005 20221220052657 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#7928DD73BA31DC28B761C56A5338C2008687A63F 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw