Socrates in the fMRI Scanner: The Neurofoundations of Morality and the Challenge to Ethics

The neuroscience of ethics is allegedly having a double impact. First, it is transforming the view of human morality through the discovery of the neurobiological underpinnings that influence moral behavior. Second, some neuroscientific findings are radically challenging traditional views on normativ...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Rueda, Jon (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: 2021
In: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Anno: 2021, Volume: 30, Fascicolo: 4, Pagine: 604-612
Altre parole chiave:B neuroscience of ethics
B Moral Behavior
B Neuroethics
B Normative ethics
B human morality
Accesso online: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1827983744
003 DE-627
005 20221220052657.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0963180121000074  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827983744 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827983744 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Rueda, Jon  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Socrates in the fMRI Scanner: The Neurofoundations of Morality and the Challenge to Ethics 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The neuroscience of ethics is allegedly having a double impact. First, it is transforming the view of human morality through the discovery of the neurobiological underpinnings that influence moral behavior. Second, some neuroscientific findings are radically challenging traditional views on normative ethics. Both claims have some truth but are also overstated. In this article, the author shows that they can be understood together, although with different caveats, under the label of “neurofoundationalism.” Whereas the neuroscientific picture of human morality is undoubtedly valuable if we avoid neuroessentialistic portraits, the empirical disruption of normative ethics seems less plausible. The neuroscience of morality, however, is providing relevant evidence that any empirically informed ethical theory needs to critically consider. Although neuroethics is not going to bridge the is–ought divide, it may establish certain facts that require us to rethink the way we achieve our ethical aspirations. 
601 |a Challenger 
650 4 |a Normative ethics 
650 4 |a neuroscience of ethics 
650 4 |a Neuroethics 
650 4 |a Moral Behavior 
650 4 |a human morality 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992  |g 30(2021), 4, Seite 604-612  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)306655039  |w (DE-600)1499985-7  |w (DE-576)081985010  |x 1469-2147  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:30  |g year:2021  |g number:4  |g pages:604-612 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180121000074  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/socrates-in-the-fmri-scanner-the-neurofoundations-of-morality-and-the-challenge-to-ethics/6470E3D5615429A26366539FCF8B7E66  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235388657 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827983744 
LOK |0 005 20221220052657 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#51F002E6D0069F4E93F72FCB5C65D1F94FACCA48 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 20-12-22  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw