Can We Justify Military Enhancements? Some Yes, Most No
The United States Department of Defense has, for at least 20 years, held the stated intention to enhance active military personnel (“warfighters”). This intention has become more acute in the face of dropping recruitment, an aging fighting force, and emerging strategic challenges. However, developin...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2022
|
| In: |
Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2022, Volume: 31, Issue: 4, Pages: 557-569 |
| Further subjects: | B
military biomedical research
B military enhancements B Enhancement |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1827981318 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221220052653.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221220s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0963180122000421 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1827981318 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1827981318 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hereth, Blake |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Hereth, Blake | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Can We Justify Military Enhancements? Some Yes, Most No |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The United States Department of Defense has, for at least 20 years, held the stated intention to enhance active military personnel (“warfighters”). This intention has become more acute in the face of dropping recruitment, an aging fighting force, and emerging strategic challenges. However, developing and testing enhancements is clouded by the ethically contested status of enhancements, the long history of abuse by military medical researchers, and new legislation in the guise of “health security” that has enabled the Department of Defense to apply medical interventions without appropriate oversight. This paper aims to reconcile existing legal and regulatory frameworks on military biomedical research with ethical concerns about military enhancements. In what follows, we first outline one justification for military enhancements. The authors then briefly address existing definitional issues over what constitutes enhancement before addressing existing research ethics regulations governing military biomedical research. Next, they argue that two common justifications for rapid military innovation in science and technology, including enhancement, fail. These justifications are (a) to satisfy a compelling military need and (b) strategic dominance. The authors then turn to an objection that turns on the idea that we need not have these justifications if warfighters are willing to adopt enhancement, and argue that laissez-faire approaches to enhancement fail in the context of the military due to pressing and historically significant concerns about coercion and exploitation. The paper concludes with what is referred to as the “least-worst” justification: Given the rise of untested enhancements in civilian and military life, we have good reason to validate potential enhancements even if they do not satisfy reasons (a) or (b) above. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a military biomedical research | |
| 650 | 4 | |a military enhancements | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Enhancement | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Evans, Nicholas |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992 |g 31(2022), 4, Seite 557-569 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)306655039 |w (DE-600)1499985-7 |w (DE-576)081985010 |x 1469-2147 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:31 |g year:2022 |g number:4 |g pages:557-569 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180122000421 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/can-we-justify-military-enhancements-some-yes-most-no/45BC5C9A61B228281E74C71AF0E506A9 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4235386220 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1827981318 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221220052654 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#D63831591E18EB5AEB04E8E9F3DE17E2A1DC9274 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Enhancement |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Amélioration humaine |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Mejoramiento humano |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Enhancement <etica medica>,Potenziamento (etica medica),Potenziamento |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 神經增強 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Melhoramento humano |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Улучшение (медицинская этика) |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ενίσχυση <ιατρική ηθική>,Βελτίωση (ιατρική ηθική),Ενδυνάμωση (ιατρική ηθική) |
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Human enhancement |