Research Domain Criteria as Psychiatric Nosology: Conceptual, Practical and Neuroethical Implications

Diagnostic classification systems in psychiatry have continued to rely on clinical phenomenology, despite limitations inherent in that approach. In view of these limitations and recent progress in neuroscience, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) has initiated the Research Domain Criteria...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori: Akram, Faisal (Autore) ; Giordano, James (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: 2017
In: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Anno: 2017, Volume: 26, Fascicolo: 4, Pagine: 592-601
Altre parole chiave:B Neuroscience
B Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)
B biopsychosocial model
B Psychiatry
B Neuroethics
Accesso online: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1827979062
003 DE-627
005 20221220052650.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S096318011700010X  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827979062 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827979062 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Akram, Faisal  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Research Domain Criteria as Psychiatric Nosology: Conceptual, Practical and Neuroethical Implications 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Diagnostic classification systems in psychiatry have continued to rely on clinical phenomenology, despite limitations inherent in that approach. In view of these limitations and recent progress in neuroscience, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) has initiated the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project to develop a more neuroscientifically based system of characterizing and classifying psychiatric disorders. The RDoC initiative aims to transform psychiatry into an integrative science of psychopathology in which mental illnesses will be defined as involving putative dysfunctions in neural nodes and networks. However, conceptual, methodological, neuroethical, and social issues inherent in and/or derived from the use of RDoC need to be addressed before any attempt is made to implement their use in clinical psychiatry. This article describes current progress in RDoC; defines key technical, neuroethical, and social issues generated by RDoC adoption and use; and posits key questions that must be addressed and resolved if RDoC are to be employed for psychiatric diagnoses and therapeutics. Specifically, we posit that objectivization of complex mental phenomena may raise ethical questions about autonomy, the value of subjective experience, what constitutes normality, what constitutes a disorder, and what represents a treatment, enablement, and/or enhancement. Ethical issues may also arise from the (mis)use of biomarkers and phenotypes in predicting and treating mental disorders, and what such definitions, predictions, and interventions portend for concepts and views of sickness, criminality, professional competency, and social functioning. Given these issues, we offer that a preparatory neuroethical framework is required to define and guide the ways in which RDoC-oriented research can—and arguably should—be utilized in clinical psychiatry, and perhaps more broadly, in the social sphere. 
601 |a Psychiatrie 
601 |a Neuroethik 
650 4 |a biopsychosocial model 
650 4 |a Neuroethics 
650 4 |a Neuroscience 
650 4 |a Psychiatry 
650 4 |a Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) 
700 1 |a Giordano, James  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992  |g 26(2017), 4, Seite 592-601  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)306655039  |w (DE-600)1499985-7  |w (DE-576)081985010  |x 1469-2147  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:26  |g year:2017  |g number:4  |g pages:592-601 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S096318011700010X  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/research-domain-criteria-as-psychiatric-nosology/348A60863163713654BDACE60EF7B9BE  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235383973 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827979062 
LOK |0 005 20221220052650 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#EFFAD3780EA4A2C9CABDAECF6CFC5D7D9DC37506 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw