Moral Bioenhancement and the Utilitarian Catastrophe

This article challenges recent calls for moral bioenhancement—the use of biomedical means, including pharmacological and genetic methods, to increase the moral value of our actions or characters. It responds to those who take a practical interest in moral bioenhancement. I argue that moral bioenhanc...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Agar, Nicholas (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2015
In: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2015, Volume: 24, Issue: 1, Pages: 37-47
Further subjects:B Morality
B Utilitarianism
B bioenhancement
B Moral Reasoning
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1827978716
003 DE-627
005 20221220052650.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0963180114000280  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827978716 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827978716 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Agar, Nicholas  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Moral Bioenhancement and the Utilitarian Catastrophe 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article challenges recent calls for moral bioenhancement—the use of biomedical means, including pharmacological and genetic methods, to increase the moral value of our actions or characters. It responds to those who take a practical interest in moral bioenhancement. I argue that moral bioenhancement is unlikely to be a good response to the extinction threats of climate change and weapons of mass destruction. Rather than alleviating those problems, it is likely to aggravate them. We should expect biomedical means to generate piecemeal enhancements of human morality. These predictably strengthen some contributors to moral judgment while leaving others comparatively unaffected. This unbalanced enhancement differs from the manner of improvement that typically results from sustained reflection. It is likely to make its subjects worse rather than better at moral reasoning. 
650 4 |a Moral Reasoning 
650 4 |a Morality 
650 4 |a Utilitarianism 
650 4 |a bioenhancement 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992  |g 24(2015), 1, Seite 37-47  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)306655039  |w (DE-600)1499985-7  |w (DE-576)081985010  |x 1469-2147  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:24  |g year:2015  |g number:1  |g pages:37-47 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180114000280  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/moral-bioenhancement-and-the-utilitarian-catastrophe/C229F28AB13C116F40FC38967B8D295D  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 24  |j 2015  |e 1  |h 37-47 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235383620 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827978716 
LOK |0 005 20221220052650 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#334F152A0F0C3A9958E05C5990F867A68E212143 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw