Normality, Therapy, and Enhancement: What Should Bioconservatives Say about the Medicalization of Love?
According to human enhancement advocates, it is morally permissible (and sometimes obligatory) to use biomedical means to modulate or select certain biological traits in order to increase people’s welfare, even when there is no pathology to be treated or prevented. Some authors have recently propose...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2015
|
In: |
Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2015, Volume: 24, Issue: 3, Pages: 347-354 |
Further subjects: | B
Therapy
B bioconservatism B Love B normality B Enhancement |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1827977760 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221220052648.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221220s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0963180114000656 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1827977760 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1827977760 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Giubilini, Alberto |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
109 | |a Giubilini, Alberto | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Normality, Therapy, and Enhancement: What Should Bioconservatives Say about the Medicalization of Love? |
264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a According to human enhancement advocates, it is morally permissible (and sometimes obligatory) to use biomedical means to modulate or select certain biological traits in order to increase people’s welfare, even when there is no pathology to be treated or prevented. Some authors have recently proposed to extend the use of biomedical means to modulate lust, attraction, and attachment. I focus on some conceptual implications of this proposal, particularly with regard to bioconservatives’ understanding of the notions of therapy and enhancement I first explain what makes the proposal of medicalizing love interesting and unique, compared to the other forms of bioenhancement usually advocated. I then discuss how the medicalization of love bears on the more general debate on human enhancement, particularly with regard to the key notion of “normality” that is commonly used to define the therapy–enhancement distinction. This analysis suggests that the medicalization of love, in virtue of its peculiarity, requires bioconservatives to reconsider their way of understanding and applying the notions of “therapy” and “enhancement.” More in particular, I show that, because a non-arbitrary and value-free notion of “therapy” cannot be applied to the case of love, bioconservatives have the burden of either providing some new criterion that could be used for drawing a line between permissible and impermissible medicalization, or demonstrating that under no circumstances—including the cases in which love is already acknowledged to require medical intervention—can love fall within the domain of medicine. | ||
601 | |a Therapie | ||
650 | 4 | |a Love | |
650 | 4 | |a bioconservatism | |
650 | 4 | |a normality | |
650 | 4 | |a Therapy | |
650 | 4 | |a Enhancement | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992 |g 24(2015), 3, Seite 347-354 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)306655039 |w (DE-600)1499985-7 |w (DE-576)081985010 |x 1469-2147 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2015 |g number:3 |g pages:347-354 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180114000656 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/normality-therapy-and-enhancement/AE4C52B14A85A839A5C10B71C3AD8B7B |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4235382675 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1827977760 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221220052648 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#B6AD97A98FE7CAD5A73BAFCBFBA65E9E9896DB0A | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Enhancement |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Amélioration humaine |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Mejoramiento humano |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Enhancement <etica medica>,Potenziamento (etica medica),Potenziamento |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 神經增強 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Melhoramento humano |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Улучшение (медицинская этика) |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ενίσχυση <ιατρική ηθική>,Βελτίωση (ιατρική ηθική),Ενδυνάμωση (ιατρική ηθική) |
SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Human enhancement |