Normality, Therapy, and Enhancement: What Should Bioconservatives Say about the Medicalization of Love?

According to human enhancement advocates, it is morally permissible (and sometimes obligatory) to use biomedical means to modulate or select certain biological traits in order to increase people’s welfare, even when there is no pathology to be treated or prevented. Some authors have recently propose...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Giubilini, Alberto (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2015
In: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2015, Volume: 24, Issue: 3, Pages: 347-354
Further subjects:B Therapy
B bioconservatism
B Love
B normality
B Enhancement
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1827977760
003 DE-627
005 20221220052648.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0963180114000656  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827977760 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827977760 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Giubilini, Alberto  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Giubilini, Alberto 
245 1 0 |a Normality, Therapy, and Enhancement: What Should Bioconservatives Say about the Medicalization of Love? 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a According to human enhancement advocates, it is morally permissible (and sometimes obligatory) to use biomedical means to modulate or select certain biological traits in order to increase people’s welfare, even when there is no pathology to be treated or prevented. Some authors have recently proposed to extend the use of biomedical means to modulate lust, attraction, and attachment. I focus on some conceptual implications of this proposal, particularly with regard to bioconservatives’ understanding of the notions of therapy and enhancement I first explain what makes the proposal of medicalizing love interesting and unique, compared to the other forms of bioenhancement usually advocated. I then discuss how the medicalization of love bears on the more general debate on human enhancement, particularly with regard to the key notion of “normality” that is commonly used to define the therapy–enhancement distinction. This analysis suggests that the medicalization of love, in virtue of its peculiarity, requires bioconservatives to reconsider their way of understanding and applying the notions of “therapy” and “enhancement.” More in particular, I show that, because a non-arbitrary and value-free notion of “therapy” cannot be applied to the case of love, bioconservatives have the burden of either providing some new criterion that could be used for drawing a line between permissible and impermissible medicalization, or demonstrating that under no circumstances—including the cases in which love is already acknowledged to require medical intervention—can love fall within the domain of medicine. 
601 |a Therapie 
650 4 |a Love 
650 4 |a bioconservatism 
650 4 |a normality 
650 4 |a Therapy 
650 4 |a Enhancement 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992  |g 24(2015), 3, Seite 347-354  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)306655039  |w (DE-600)1499985-7  |w (DE-576)081985010  |x 1469-2147  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:24  |g year:2015  |g number:3  |g pages:347-354 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180114000656  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/normality-therapy-and-enhancement/AE4C52B14A85A839A5C10B71C3AD8B7B  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235382675 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827977760 
LOK |0 005 20221220052648 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#B6AD97A98FE7CAD5A73BAFCBFBA65E9E9896DB0A 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Enhancement 
STB 0 0 |a Amélioration humaine 
STC 0 0 |a Mejoramiento humano 
STD 0 0 |a Enhancement <etica medica>,Potenziamento (etica medica),Potenziamento 
STF 0 0 |a 神經增強 
STG 0 0 |a Melhoramento humano 
STH 0 0 |a Улучшение (медицинская этика) 
STI 0 0 |a Ενίσχυση <ιατρική ηθική>,Βελτίωση (ιατρική ηθική),Ενδυνάμωση (ιατρική ηθική) 
SYE 0 0 |a Human enhancement