Medical Ethics: Common or Uncommon Morality?
This paper challenges the long-standing and widely accepted view that medical ethics is nothing more than common morality applied to clinical matters. It argues against Tom Beauchamp and James Childress’s four principles; Bernard Gert, K. Danner Clouser and Charles Culver’s ten rules; and Albert Jon...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2020
|
| In: |
Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2020, Volume: 29, Issue: 3, Pages: 404-420 |
| Further subjects: | B
uncommon morality
B medical professionalism B common morality B Medical Ethics |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1827976853 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221220052647.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221220s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0963180120000146 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1827976853 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1827976853 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Rhodes, Rosamond |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Medical Ethics: Common or Uncommon Morality? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper challenges the long-standing and widely accepted view that medical ethics is nothing more than common morality applied to clinical matters. It argues against Tom Beauchamp and James Childress’s four principles; Bernard Gert, K. Danner Clouser and Charles Culver’s ten rules; and Albert Jonsen, Mark Siegler, and William Winslade’s four topics approaches to medical ethics. First, a negative argument shows that common morality does not provide an account of medical ethics and then a positive argument demonstrates why the medical profession requires its own distinctive ethics. The paper also provides a way to distinguish roles and professions and an account of the distinctive duties of medical ethics. It concludes by emphasizing ways in which the uncommon morality approach to medical ethics is markedly different from the common morality approach. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a uncommon morality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a medical professionalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Medical Ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a common morality | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992 |g 29(2020), 3, Seite 404-420 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)306655039 |w (DE-600)1499985-7 |w (DE-576)081985010 |x 1469-2147 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:29 |g year:2020 |g number:3 |g pages:404-420 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180120000146 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/medical-ethics-common-or-uncommon-morality/5D68B8528411A58167781465FFBCE4E7 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 29 |j 2020 |e 3 |h 404-420 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4235381768 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1827976853 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221220052647 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#E709B1FAE4885DBAB9A0310284C8684DE3D2EDC2 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||