Medicine and Contextual Justice
This article provides a critique of the monolithic accounts that define justice in terms of a single and often inappropriate goal. By providing an array of real examples, I argue that there is no simple definition of justice, because allocations that express justice are governed by a variety of reas...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2018
|
| In: |
Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2018, Volume: 27, Issue: 2, Pages: 228-249 |
| Further subjects: | B
medical practice
B Justice B prioritizing principles B human interests B medical allocations |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1827974966 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221220052644.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221220s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0963180117000573 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1827974966 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1827974966 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Rhodes, Rosamond |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Medicine and Contextual Justice |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article provides a critique of the monolithic accounts that define justice in terms of a single and often inappropriate goal. By providing an array of real examples, I argue that there is no simple definition of justice, because allocations that express justice are governed by a variety of reasons that reasonable people endorse for their saliency. In making difficult choices about ranking priorities, different considerations have different importance in different kinds of situations. In this sense, justice is a conclusion about whether an allocation reflects the human interests and priorities that are at stake. The article describes how several principles of justice have a legitimate place in medical allocations. To achieve justice within medical practice, professionals should focus on the human interests and compelling reasons for prioritizing specific principles within their specific medical domain. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a prioritizing principles | |
| 650 | 4 | |a human interests | |
| 650 | 4 | |a medical practice | |
| 650 | 4 | |a medical allocations | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Justice | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992 |g 27(2018), 2, Seite 228-249 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)306655039 |w (DE-600)1499985-7 |w (DE-576)081985010 |x 1469-2147 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:27 |g year:2018 |g number:2 |g pages:228-249 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180117000573 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/medicine-and-contextual-justice/C75F059CC8D3EB51C87D2E84ABCE81E0 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4235379879 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1827974966 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221220052644 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#F9A70685FACEBD4F101ABAFFB05A467289E7E1F2 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||