Neurolaw and Neuroethics
This short article proposes a conceptual structure for “neurolaw,” modeled loosely on the bipartite division of the sister field of neuroethics by Adina Roskies into the “ethics of neuroscience” and the “neuroscience of ethics.” As normative fields addressing the implications of scientific discoveri...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2018
|
In: |
Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2018, Volume: 27, Issue: 4, Pages: 590-598 |
Further subjects: | B
law and neuroscience
B Responsibility B Neuroethics B neurolaw |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1827972955 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20221220052641.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 221220s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0963180118000117 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1827972955 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1827972955 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Chandler, Jennifer A. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Neurolaw and Neuroethics |
264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This short article proposes a conceptual structure for “neurolaw,” modeled loosely on the bipartite division of the sister field of neuroethics by Adina Roskies into the “ethics of neuroscience” and the “neuroscience of ethics.” As normative fields addressing the implications of scientific discoveries and expanding technological capacities affecting the brain, “neurolaw” and neuroethics have followed parallel paths. Similar foundational questions arise for both about the validity and utility of recognizing them as distinct subfields of law and ethics, respectively. In both, a useful distinction can be drawn between a self-reflexive inquiry (the neuroscience of ethics and law) and an inquiry into the development and use of brain science and technologies (the ethics and law of neuroscience). In both fields, these two forms of inquiry interact in interesting ways. In addition to a proposed conceptual structure for neurolaw, the article also addresses the neurolegal versions of the critiques made against neuroethics, including charges of reductionism, fact/value confusion, and biological essentialism. | ||
601 | |a Neuroethik | ||
650 | 4 | |a Responsibility | |
650 | 4 | |a Neuroethics | |
650 | 4 | |a law and neuroscience | |
650 | 4 | |a neurolaw | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992 |g 27(2018), 4, Seite 590-598 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)306655039 |w (DE-600)1499985-7 |w (DE-576)081985010 |x 1469-2147 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:27 |g year:2018 |g number:4 |g pages:590-598 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180118000117 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/neurolaw-and-neuroethics/16E694B672AA41558F2A8DB616222D9F |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4235377868 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1827972955 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20221220052641 | ||
LOK | |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#64954401F06294893D6253CC396C2DFE7541A378 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |