Return to Reason, by Stephen Toulmin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001. 243 pp. 24.95

If you buy and read only one book this year, make it this one. Then, after you read and reread this book, buy and read, if you have not done so already, it's prequel, Cosmopolis. When you've done that you may find yourself wondering one thing and worrying about another (at least, where med...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Scofield, Giles (Author)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2002
In: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2002, Volume: 11, Issue: 2, Pages: 197-199
Further subjects:B Book review
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1827972726
003 DE-627
005 20221220235204.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2002 xx |||||oo 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0963180102210130  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827972726 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827972726 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Scofield, Giles  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Return to Reason, by Stephen Toulmin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001. 243 pp. 24.95 
264 1 |c 2002 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a If you buy and read only one book this year, make it this one. Then, after you read and reread this book, buy and read, if you have not done so already, it's prequel, Cosmopolis. When you've done that you may find yourself wondering one thing and worrying about another (at least, where medical ethics is concerned). Why do we hear so little about Montaigne and Wittgenstein? And why do we bother so much with Descartes and his followers? Did philosophy take a wrong turn somewhere? Has ethics gone in one direction, philosophy in another? Did we moderns zig, when we could, and should, have zagged? 
601 |a Cambridge 
601 |a Harvard University 
655 7 |a Rezension  |0 (DE-588)4049712-4  |0 (DE-627)106186019  |0 (DE-576)209083166  |2 gnd-content 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992  |g 11(2002), 2, Seite 197-199  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)306655039  |w (DE-600)1499985-7  |w (DE-576)081985010  |x 1469-2147  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:11  |g year:2002  |g number:2  |g pages:197-199 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180102210130  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/return-to-reason-by-stephen-toulmin-cambridge-ma-harvard-university-press-2001-243-pp-2495/74B9E090D0740B7715A6A244425E36AE  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235377639 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827972726 
LOK |0 005 20221220092042 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#8F5993A7CBD91263FF61041F5FA81DBE82D705A2 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw