Epistocracy for Online Deliberative Bioethics

The suggestion that deliberative democratic approaches would suit the management of bioethical policymaking in democratic pluralistic societies has triggered what has been called the “deliberative turn” in health policy and bioethics. Most of the empirical work in this area has focused on the alloca...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Schiavone, Giuseppe (Author) ; Mameli, Matteo (Author) ; Boniolo, Giovanni (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2015
In: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2015, Volume: 24, Issue: 3, Pages: 272-280
Further subjects:B epistocracy
B Participation
B Deliberative Democracy
B Bioethics
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1827971517
003 DE-627
005 20221220052639.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0963180114000590  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827971517 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827971517 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Schiavone, Giuseppe  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Epistocracy for Online Deliberative Bioethics 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The suggestion that deliberative democratic approaches would suit the management of bioethical policymaking in democratic pluralistic societies has triggered what has been called the “deliberative turn” in health policy and bioethics. Most of the empirical work in this area has focused on the allocation of healthcare resources and priority setting at the local or national level. The variety of the more or less articulated theoretical efforts behind such initiatives is remarkable and has been accompanied, to date, by an overall lack of method specificity. We propose a set of methodological requirements for online deliberative procedures for bioethics. We provide a theoretical motivation for these requirements. In particular, we discuss and adapt an “epistocratic” proposal and argue that, regardless of its merits as a general political theory, a more refined version of its normative claims can generate a useful framework for the design of bioethical forums that combine maximal inclusiveness with informed and reasonable deliberation. 
650 4 |a epistocracy 
650 4 |a Participation 
650 4 |a Deliberative Democracy 
650 4 |a Bioethics 
700 1 |a Mameli, Matteo  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Boniolo, Giovanni  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992  |g 24(2015), 3, Seite 272-280  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)306655039  |w (DE-600)1499985-7  |w (DE-576)081985010  |x 1469-2147  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:24  |g year:2015  |g number:3  |g pages:272-280 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180114000590  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/epistocracy-for-online-deliberative-bioethics/D2AA7145C5BCDF3A50D0F3BE55006AA7  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 24  |j 2015  |e 3  |h 272-280 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 423537642X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827971517 
LOK |0 005 20221220052639 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#C3531739A3BE5BD4E963D5EB565151096D811C3D 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw