Alternative Dispute Resolution and Research Misconduct

“Any bad settlement,” the wise patent litigator Elmer S. Albritton once observed, “is better than a good lawsuit.” Given the notorious strain of court proceedings and the recognition that settlement does not always prove attainable, a popular movement has recently arisen in favor of “alternative dis...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Guenin, Louis M. (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: 1997
In: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Anno: 1997, Volume: 6, Fascicolo: 1, Pagine: 72-77
Accesso online: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1827970669
003 DE-627
005 20221220052637.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s1997 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0963180100007623  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827970669 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827970669 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Guenin, Louis M.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Alternative Dispute Resolution and Research Misconduct 
264 1 |c 1997 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a “Any bad settlement,” the wise patent litigator Elmer S. Albritton once observed, “is better than a good lawsuit.” Given the notorious strain of court proceedings and the recognition that settlement does not always prove attainable, a popular movement has recently arisen in favor of “alternative dispute resolution” (or ADR). Indeed it has seemed to many who have participated as committee members, witnesses, or respondents in scientific misconduct cases that there ought to be some method of resolving such matters that is less vexing than traditional adjudication. 
601 |a Resolution 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992  |g 6(1997), 1, Seite 72-77  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)306655039  |w (DE-600)1499985-7  |w (DE-576)081985010  |x 1469-2147  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:6  |g year:1997  |g number:1  |g pages:72-77 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180100007623  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/alternative-dispute-resolution-and-research-misconduct/E28CD2F50320138C767B0D00CC1E2E17  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235375571 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827970669 
LOK |0 005 20221220052637 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#93CDD7CB2C3354947CA98DC89FFBEFA304954B23 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 20-12-22  |b l01 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw