Reconsidering the Moralization of Health: Practices Versus Concepts, and What We Can Learn from Evidence-based Research
This article aims to do two things. First, it argues that moralization of health occurs not only at the practical level of individual healthcare choices and health states, but also at the conceptual level of health itself. This is most evident in cases where the concept of health is presumed to poss...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2019
|
| In: |
Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2019, Volume: 28, Issue: 2, Pages: 215-224 |
| Further subjects: | B
cultural values
B overrdingness B medical values B moralization of health B conceptual moralization of health B Responsibilization B Evidence-Based Medicine |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1827970235 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221220052637.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221220s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0963180119000069 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1827970235 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1827970235 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Thomas, S. Joshua |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Reconsidering the Moralization of Health: Practices Versus Concepts, and What We Can Learn from Evidence-based Research |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article aims to do two things. First, it argues that moralization of health occurs not only at the practical level of individual healthcare choices and health states, but also at the conceptual level of health itself. This is most evident in cases where the concept of health is presumed to possess the property of “overridingness” when compared to competing values and norms, that is, when it is treated as taking precedence over other values and norms it may come into conflict with. Second, the article makes a case for being critically skeptical of specific deployments of the concept of health when it has been moralized in this way. In such cases, what typically results is that some other personal value/norm, or set of values/norms, held by the individual is treated as intrinsically at odds with the concept of health, which is presumed, uncritically, to be superior, often because it is taken to be free-standing and self-justifying. Yet, a growing body of evidence-based research suggests that the role played by dimensions of personal meaningfulness in the quality of individuals’ overall health is quite underappreciated. It is useful to think of these dimensions of personal meaning and significance as representing the individual’s values. Thus, taking these data more seriously ought to lead to a reevaluation of the moralization of health at the conceptual level. In the first place, it is not obvious that if the concept of health runs afoul of other values/norms held by an individual, the latter should automatically yield. In the second place, they suggest that other values/norms held by an individual are not necessarily intrinsically opposed to the concept of health, but in fact may go a good distance in support of it. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Evidence-Based Medicine | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Responsibilization | |
| 650 | 4 | |a moralization of health | |
| 650 | 4 | |a cultural values | |
| 650 | 4 | |a medical values | |
| 650 | 4 | |a overrdingness | |
| 650 | 4 | |a conceptual moralization of health | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992 |g 28(2019), 2, Seite 215-224 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)306655039 |w (DE-600)1499985-7 |w (DE-576)081985010 |x 1469-2147 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:28 |g year:2019 |g number:2 |g pages:215-224 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180119000069 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/reconsidering-the-moralization-of-health-practices-versus-concepts-and-what-we-can-learn-from-evidencebased-research/DCBF42CEE696310F2EEC173972BA6D6F |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 28 |j 2019 |e 2 |h 215-224 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4235375148 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1827970235 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221220052637 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#A875A3B1E62C6E617B1655D25B7C5BA5FB106842 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||