Can Communities Protect Autonomy? Ethical Dilemmas in HIV Preventative Drug Trials

Before sailing past the sirens' “flowery meadow,” Ulysses instructed his sailors to lash him to the mast so that he would not succumb to the siren's singing. His advance directive demonstrated that he valued his dispositional or long-term autonomy over his unquestioned right to make decisi...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zion, Deborah (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 1995
In: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 1995, Volume: 4, Issue: 4, Pages: 516-523
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1827969016
003 DE-627
005 20221220052635.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s1995 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0963180100006356  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827969016 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827969016 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Zion, Deborah  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Can Communities Protect Autonomy? Ethical Dilemmas in HIV Preventative Drug Trials 
264 1 |c 1995 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Before sailing past the sirens' “flowery meadow,” Ulysses instructed his sailors to lash him to the mast so that he would not succumb to the siren's singing. His advance directive demonstrated that he valued his dispositional or long-term autonomy over his unquestioned right to make decisions. He also indicated to his oarsmen that he understood the nature of temptation and his inability to resist it. Ideas of autonomy and sexual choice are central to this discussion of new AIDS treatments, especially the trials of preventative vaccines. Questions arise over the rights of individuals and the extent that these should be limited by concerns of the gay community. Should the gay community intervene in the risky decisions of individuals if no explicit advance directive exists? If so, how do they justify their paternalism? Could their aims not be better served through strengthening the individual dispositional autonomy of trial participants rather than making specific claims about the common good? 
601 |a Autonomie 
601 |a Dilemma 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992  |g 4(1995), 4, Seite 516-523  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)306655039  |w (DE-600)1499985-7  |w (DE-576)081985010  |x 1469-2147  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:4  |g year:1995  |g number:4  |g pages:516-523 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180100006356  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/abs/can-communities-protect-autonomy-ethical-dilemmas-in-hiv-preventative-drug-trials/2278BD5773DF980954E4C8572654EFFB  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235373927 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827969016 
LOK |0 005 20221220052635 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#7669A22E3A1538172B20F3D66A6E767920B58E64 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw