The Medicalization of Love and Narrow and Broad Conceptions of Human Well-Being

Would a “medicalization” of love be a “good” or “bad” form of medicalization? In discussing this question, Earp, Sandberg, and Savulescu primarily focus on the potential positive and negative consequences of turning love into a medical issue. But it can also be asked whether there is something intri...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nyholm, Sven (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2015
In: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2015, Volume: 24, Issue: 3, Pages: 337-346
Further subjects:B Human Enhancement
B Well-being
B Medicalization
B Love
B category mistakes
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1827968613
003 DE-627
005 20221220052634.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0963180114000644  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827968613 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827968613 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Nyholm, Sven  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Medicalization of Love and Narrow and Broad Conceptions of Human Well-Being 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Would a “medicalization” of love be a “good” or “bad” form of medicalization? In discussing this question, Earp, Sandberg, and Savulescu primarily focus on the potential positive and negative consequences of turning love into a medical issue. But it can also be asked whether there is something intrinsically regrettable about medicalizing love. It is argued here that the medicalization of love can be seen as an “evaluative category mistake”: it treats a core human value (love) as if it were mainly a means to other ends (viz. physical health and hedonic well-being). It is also argued that Earp et al’s closing argument (that a scientific perspective on love actually adds more value to love) can be seen as involving another evaluative category mistake: it treats an object of desire and practical interest (namely, love) as if it mainly were an object of scientific contemplation and theoretical interest. It is concluded that, to relate love to health and well-being in a more satisfying way, we should construe the latter two in broader ways, whereby love is itself a component or element of human flourishing. 
650 4 |a Well-being 
650 4 |a category mistakes 
650 4 |a Human Enhancement 
650 4 |a Medicalization 
650 4 |a Love 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992  |g 24(2015), 3, Seite 337-346  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)306655039  |w (DE-600)1499985-7  |w (DE-576)081985010  |x 1469-2147  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:24  |g year:2015  |g number:3  |g pages:337-346 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180114000644  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/medicalization-of-love-and-narrow-and-broad-conceptions-of-human-wellbeing/9A4F750FC4A01897F1F3310A7571126C  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 24  |j 2015  |e 3  |h 337-346 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235373528 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827968613 
LOK |0 005 20221220052634 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#F38E6C31128BD7AD0FAFC3F5000F302AC951E22B 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw