Response to “A Critique of UNOS Liver Allocation Policy” by Kenneth Einar Himma (CQ Vol 8, No 3)
The critique of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) liver allocation policy by Kenneth Himma has flaws related to the complexities and evolutionary nature of the field. Recent improvements in transplantation have achieved national attention of this sort. There has been an evolution, unequale...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2000
|
| In: |
Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2000, Volume: 9, Issue: 2, Pages: 275-280 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1827968362 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221220052634.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221220s2000 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0963180100212139 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1827968362 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1827968362 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Burdick, James |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Response to “A Critique of UNOS Liver Allocation Policy” by Kenneth Einar Himma (CQ Vol 8, No 3) |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2000 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The critique of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) liver allocation policy by Kenneth Himma has flaws related to the complexities and evolutionary nature of the field. Recent improvements in transplantation have achieved national attention of this sort. There has been an evolution, unequaled elsewhere in medicine, of a national data set and national rules. The transplant community might have been more effective in communicating the details of this, and the problems associated with organ allocation policy. The novelty and complexity of the new rules understandably can produce misleading conclusions. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992 |g 9(2000), 2, Seite 275-280 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)306655039 |w (DE-600)1499985-7 |w (DE-576)081985010 |x 1469-2147 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:9 |g year:2000 |g number:2 |g pages:275-280 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180100212139 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/response-to-a-critique-of-unos-liver-allocation-policy-by-kenneth-einar-himma-cq-vol-8-no-3/B9C85F6B752F80478053329FDA4AAC36 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4235373277 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1827968362 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221220052634 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#333EDDFEF76D691158A3E50B8392B58A1EA13823 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||