Dignity: Two Riddles and Four Concepts

“Dissecting Bioethics,” edited by Tuija Takala and Matti Häyry, welcomes contributions on the conceptual and theoretical dimensions of bioethics.The section is dedicated to the idea that words defined by bioethicists and others should not be allowed to imprison people's actual concerns, emotion...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Schroeder, Doris (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2008
In: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2008, Volume: 17, Issue: 2, Pages: 230-238
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1827967765
003 DE-627
005 20221220052633.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0963180108080262  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827967765 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827967765 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Schroeder, Doris  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Dignity: Two Riddles and Four Concepts 
264 1 |c 2008 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a “Dissecting Bioethics,” edited by Tuija Takala and Matti Häyry, welcomes contributions on the conceptual and theoretical dimensions of bioethics.The section is dedicated to the idea that words defined by bioethicists and others should not be allowed to imprison people's actual concerns, emotions, and thoughts. Papers that expose the many meanings of a concept, describe the different readings of a moral doctrine, or provide an alternative angle to seemingly self-evident issues are therefore particularly appreciated.The themes covered in the section so far include dignity, naturalness, public interest, community, disability, autonomy, parity of reasoning, symbolic appeals, and toleration.All submitted papers are peer reviewed. To submit a paper or to discuss a suitable topic, contact Tuija Takala at tuija.takalahelsinki.fi.I would like to thank research seminar members at the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics at the University of Melbourne, Australia, Armin Schmidt, Julie Lucas, and Tuija Takala for their helpful comments. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992  |g 17(2008), 2, Seite 230-238  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)306655039  |w (DE-600)1499985-7  |w (DE-576)081985010  |x 1469-2147  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:17  |g year:2008  |g number:2  |g pages:230-238 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180108080262  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/dignity-two-riddles-and-four-concepts/2E39A12774103BA1BD198C8FDD8C5DF6  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 423537267X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827967765 
LOK |0 005 20221220052633 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#543465CD9EBF2AB00CB113AF0A7FCEA2481075AD 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw