The Flaws and Human Harms of Animal Experimentation

Nonhuman animal (“animal”) experimentation is typically defended by arguments that it is reliable, that animals provide sufficiently good models of human biology and diseases to yield relevant information, and that, consequently, its use provides major human health benefits. I demonstrate that a gro...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Akhtar, Aysha (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2015
In: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2015, Volume: 24, Issue: 4, Pages: 407-419
Further subjects:B drug development
B medical testing
B animal ethics
B human ethics
B Animal Research
B human health
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1827967455
003 DE-627
005 20221220052632.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0963180115000079  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827967455 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827967455 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Akhtar, Aysha  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Flaws and Human Harms of Animal Experimentation 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Nonhuman animal (“animal”) experimentation is typically defended by arguments that it is reliable, that animals provide sufficiently good models of human biology and diseases to yield relevant information, and that, consequently, its use provides major human health benefits. I demonstrate that a growing body of scientific literature critically assessing the validity of animal experimentation generally (and animal modeling specifically) raises important concerns about its reliability and predictive value for human outcomes and for understanding human physiology. The unreliability of animal experimentation across a wide range of areas undermines scientific arguments in favor of the practice. Additionally, I show how animal experimentation often significantly harms humans through misleading safety studies, potential abandonment of effective therapeutics, and direction of resources away from more effective testing methods. The resulting evidence suggests that the collective harms and costs to humans from animal experimentation outweigh potential benefits and that resources would be better invested in developing human-based testing methods. 
601 |a Experiment 
650 4 |a animal ethics 
650 4 |a drug development 
650 4 |a human ethics 
650 4 |a human health 
650 4 |a medical testing 
650 4 |a Animal Research 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992  |g 24(2015), 4, Seite 407-419  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)306655039  |w (DE-600)1499985-7  |w (DE-576)081985010  |x 1469-2147  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:24  |g year:2015  |g number:4  |g pages:407-419 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180115000079  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/flaws-and-human-harms-of-animal-experimentation/78D1F5E6B65AE7157B7AA85FF3F06017  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 24  |j 2015  |e 4  |h 407-419 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 423537236X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827967455 
LOK |0 005 20221220052632 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#B5296337A6405346467487E02FC4BA4A09D8A3C3 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw