The Instability of the Standard Justification for Physician-Assisted Suicide
Proponents commonly justify the legalization of physician-assisted suicide (PAS) in terms of a patient's wanting to die (autonomy) and the patient's having a medically established good reason for suicide. These are the common elements of the standard justification offered for the legalizat...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Pubblicazione: |
2001
|
| In: |
Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Anno: 2001, Volume: 10, Fascicolo: 1, Pagine: 103-109 |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 182796717X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221220052632.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 221220s2001 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0963180101001141 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)182796717X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP182796717X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Cavanaugh, Thomas A. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Instability of the Standard Justification for Physician-Assisted Suicide |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2001 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Proponents commonly justify the legalization of physician-assisted suicide (PAS) in terms of a patient's wanting to die (autonomy) and the patient's having a medically established good reason for suicide. These are the common elements of the standard justification offered for the legalization of PAS. In what follows, I argue that these two conditions exist in significant tension with one another, operating according to distinct dynamics that render the justification for PAS an unstable “let it be so” basis for public policy. Moreover, no natural connection keeps these two criteria united. Indeed—as I argue—the two elements of the justification oppose and threaten to exclude one another. Thus, the PAS justification is too labile a basis for sound public policy. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992 |g 10(2001), 1, Seite 103-109 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)306655039 |w (DE-600)1499985-7 |w (DE-576)081985010 |x 1469-2147 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:10 |g year:2001 |g number:1 |g pages:103-109 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180101001141 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/instability-of-the-standard-justification-for-physicianassisted-suicide/AF6923B5B8A9D85CFF989C513172D549 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4235372084 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 182796717X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20221220052632 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#144A47E7199B5F0079FE6C893C3190979D849D0C | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
