Parental Love and the Ethics of Sex Selection

In 2003, the United Kingdom's Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) published a report entitled Sex Selection: Options for Regulation. The report outlined the findings of a 2-year review of available sex selection techniques and recommended that the United Kingdom ought not to per...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Herissone-Kelly, Peter (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2007
In: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2007, Volume: 16, Issue: 3, Pages: 326-335
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1827965681
003 DE-627
005 20221220052629.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0963180107070399  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827965681 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827965681 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Herissone-Kelly, Peter  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Parental Love and the Ethics of Sex Selection 
264 1 |c 2007 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In 2003, the United Kingdom's Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) published a report entitled Sex Selection: Options for Regulation. The report outlined the findings of a 2-year review of available sex selection techniques and recommended that the United Kingdom ought not to permit any regulated technique to be used other than for medical reasons (i.e., other than for the avoidance of serious sex-linked genetic conditions). In so doing, it reflected the widespread opinion—repeatedly expressed in the public consultations that formed the cornerstone of the HFEA's review—that there is something ethically unacceptable, or at least ethically suspect, about sex selection for nonmedical, or “social,” reasons.I thank Dr. Doris Schroeder for her incisive and extremely useful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992  |g 16(2007), 3, Seite 326-335  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)306655039  |w (DE-600)1499985-7  |w (DE-576)081985010  |x 1469-2147  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:16  |g year:2007  |g number:3  |g pages:326-335 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180107070399  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-quarterly-of-healthcare-ethics/article/parental-love-and-the-ethics-of-sex-selection/E38ECF6D006621C5CB0956A852051A08  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 16  |j 2007  |e 3  |h 326-335 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235370596 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827965681 
LOK |0 005 20221220052629 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#78D4FF1E04B0F6F11E12E465719653D81F411362 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw