A Scientific Account of Meaning: Deflationary but Not Disenchanting

Abstract. In The Really Hard Problem, Owen Flanagan maintains that accounting for meaning requires going beyond the resources of the physical, biological, social, and mind sciences. He notes that the religious myths and fantastical stories that once “funded” flourishing lives and made life meaningfu...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wiebe, Donald (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2009
In: Zygon
Year: 2009, Volume: 44, Issue: 1, Pages: 31-40
Further subjects:B flourishing lives
B Science
B Naturalism
B myth / religion
B Eudaimonia
B Meaning
B Disenchantment
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1827960620
003 DE-627
005 20221220052620.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221220s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2009.00983.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1827960620 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1827960620 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Wiebe, Donald  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A Scientific Account of Meaning: Deflationary but Not Disenchanting 
264 1 |c 2009 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Abstract. In The Really Hard Problem, Owen Flanagan maintains that accounting for meaning requires going beyond the resources of the physical, biological, social, and mind sciences. He notes that the religious myths and fantastical stories that once “funded” flourishing lives and made life meaningful have been epistemically discredited by science but nevertheless insists that meaning does exist and can be fully accounted for only in a form of systematic philosophical theorizing that is continuous with science and does not need to invoke myth. He sees such a mode of thought as a new, empirical-normative science, which he labels eudaimonistic scientia, that evades the disenchantment produced by natural scientific accounts of meaning. I argue that such an empirical-normative science does not provide us with a scientific account of meaning but is itself simply another way of making sense of one's life that is open to scientific explanation. Such an explanation will be deflationary in the sense that it presumes no greater scheme of things for meaning beyond the span of human existence (collective and possibly individual) but not disenchanting in that it does not explain away the flourishing lives human persons and communities create for themselves. 
650 4 |a Science 
650 4 |a Naturalism 
650 4 |a myth/religion 
650 4 |a Meaning 
650 4 |a flourishing lives 
650 4 |a Eudaimonia 
650 4 |a Disenchantment 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zygon  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1966  |g 44(2009), 1, Seite 31-40  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300593570  |w (DE-600)1482903-4  |w (DE-576)090854799  |x 1467-9744  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:44  |g year:2009  |g number:1  |g pages:31-40 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2009.00983.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2009.00983.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 44  |j 2009  |e 1  |h 31-40 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4235365533 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1827960620 
LOK |0 005 20221220052620 
LOK |0 008 221220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-12-06#91D678C18F3E6A3A6ED1C9977D3CE7AD457390B6 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL